Friday, April 26, 2013

San Jose police union pension reduction for new officers is complete


Not complete, existing officers want their pay and raises restored.

Silicon Valley Mercury News/John Woolfolk, 4/25/13.  "San Jose, officers settle dispute over new police officer pensions."

  Better deal in Pacifica, safer too
"SAN JOSE -- San Jose and its police union struck a deal on reducing pensions for new officers late Thursday, ending a months-long battle over efforts to cut costly retirement benefits at least for future city cops. ....  City correspondence with the officers' union showed the two sides agreed on the basics of a new-officer pension plan. It would raise the minimum age for full retirement benefits from 50 to 60 and lower benefit formulas. The maximum pension would be 65 percent of pay instead of 90 percent, with cost-of-living increases capped at 1.5 percent instead of the current 3 percent.

....  San Jose officials have yet to reach an agreement with firefighters on new-hire pensions, and the city is asking a judge to compel arbitration.

The city and police still are scheduled for arbitration starting May 6 at City Hall on renewing the police officers' contract. The officers are seeking to restore 10-percent pay cuts and additional raises, while the city is seeking limited raises. The two sides have chosen retired Judge John A. Flaherty as the neutral arbitrator."    Read article.    

Note:  photograph from an unrelated Examiner.com article.  

Posted by Kathy Meeh 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Whadda ya mean? Restore the 10% cuts? Hey, at least we won't have to deal with that in Pacifica since our city employees didn't take any real cuts to wages. Brilliant move council. Now, don't you give them back that Woolite allowance for their uniforms. A deal is a deal!

Anonymous said...

I'm glad I live in a rich city like Pacifica where we have plenty of surplus so our city can perform it's main duty which is to provide high paying jobs for their friends.

Don't look at that woman behind the screen. The great and powerful Ritzma has spoken. (Que thunder as peasants cringe)

Anonymous said...

@412 It's more like Council has spoken. They call the shots and they approve the bargaining strategy and the contracts. Ritzma and Rhodes do not. People in their jobs are expected to take the blame and never the credit. Goes with the territory and the big salaries.

Anonymous said...

Awe the poor cops have to wait until 60 to retire. Most of us don't get SSI until 67. Awe they got their pay cut down. Most taxpayers make a fraction of what they get. Awe they took 2 holidays from Pacifica PD. Do we even get 10 holidays? Awe awe awe poor Unions.

Anonymous said...

This council is not calling any shots. They look to staff to tell them what to do and what to think.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
This council is not calling any shots. They look to staff to tell them what to do and what to think.

April 27, 2013 at 8:25 AM


Or when Pete, was on council, he waited for John Curtis, to call him and tell him what to say, do and what to vote for.