City Council's Tax Appetite
Pacifica
has lost its way. City Council just doesn't get it. More taxes, however
prettied up and marketed, are not the answer. Tax Measure R on the
November 2 ballot is another in a long line of misguided tax schemes and
actually leads the way for another $6 million in new taxes within 14
months.
California
unemployment is over 12%. Property values have fallen. Home sales have
dropped. People are struggling to make ends meet. Personal income is
flat. People are rightfully very anxious about the future. A recession
is not the time to pick the public's pocket.
Here is a critical part of the official ballot statement for Tax Measure R signed by the entire City Council in August 2010:
"Pacifica continues
to spend
more than it receives"
Well,
City Council wasn't kidding when they admit to spending more than they
receive. It's been going on for years, and certainly made worse by the
recession. Just exactly what is the point they are trying to get
across with a statement like that? Don't forget, two of the incumbents
think they have done such a good job of spending more than they get that
they are asking us to re-elect them!
These
same 2 have been part of the process of approving salaries and benefits
that Council isn't able to fund. Not a ringing endorsement of fiscal
responsibility! Salary and benefits are a huge part of our budget, as
they are in other municipalities. A large difference is the ability to
pay those costs. We can't afford what has been negotiated by our council
over the past 12 years.
For
the past ten years, Council has been piling up the debt. The total
city indebtedness is north of $125,000,000. That's $6,250 per voter.
Employee
pension debt alone from years prior to 2009 is $32 million, being paid
by the taxpayers. That isn't taking into account the ongoing pension
debt piling up today again.
The
City Council advertises their economic plan. Council figures this plan
will generate $6 million over five years. Take a moment to look at this
plan found here:.
It's
all of three pages. It contains no due dates for any objective. No
revenue expectations are attached to any part of the plan. The committee
that produced this holds monthly meetings. No meeting minutes are
available to gauge progress. No list of committee members is on the city
website, and the parameters or financial background to participate in
this process are unknown.
In
short, our supposed roadmap out of this Council generated mess is a
casual vague plan lacking due dates and revenue targets. The plan is so
lacking in detail it would get you flunked out of your high school term
paper class. It holds the council to no accountability standards. Give
us your money and trust us says Council. You think that's right?
Unfortunately,
City Council has taken us for this ride before. In 2004, Council
convinced the voters to approve a five year fire assessment tax to
support Pacifica fire services. Many people expected an economic plan to
be developed while the five year tax was in place to fully support fire
services. Wrong. Council immediately laid off three firefighters. No
economic plan was developed during the five year tax. Council broke
faith.
Over
the horizon, in 2011, is the first leg of $6 million in new taxes---a
$4 million public safety property tax assessment. This tax is rigged by
City Council to get around Prop 13 and will require only a majority
vote, not 2/3. Adding insult to injury, only property owners will be
allowed to vote. If you are a voter and do not own property, you cannot
vote. If you are a renter, you cannot vote. If two spouses are on the
title of the house, only one gets to vote. If you own multiple
properties in town, you get multiple votes, one for each property. If
you are an out-of-town landlord or are an out-of-town corporation (Bank
of America anyone?) and own property in Pacifica, you get to vote.
In
conclusion, vote No on Tax Measure R in November. The Pacifica Chamber
of Commerce authored the argument against this tax. Not a single hotel
manager thinks this tax helps Pacifica hotels in a very tough economy.
Even San Francisco is rejected new taxes and fees, demolishing the
Pacifica Council's argument: well everyone else is raising taxes. Measure R just whets the appetite of City council for more taxes next year, taxes
that disproportionally keeps renters, minorities, younger people
without houses from voting at all and allows out-of-town corporations to
vote. The
economic plan the City touts is of no value. Council broke faith by
laying off firefighters in 2004 after the five year tax was approved.
We deserve a better, leaner city budget that addresses the tough issues Council has ignored for years.
Jim Wagner & Mark Stechbart
Submitted by Jim Wagner