 |
Alternative plan pink sheet: sue "everyone",
alleged objective: delay, gain zero. |
 |
| BTW, why not ride your bicycle to work? |
"Dear "Editor: No
surprise that opponents who desire to stop the Highway 1 safety
widening launched another lawsuit. After all
they lost 100% of their
county lawsuit when the trial judge ruled all environmental protections
have been honored. So they will continue to sue and complain, increase
taxpayer costs, keep us stuck in traffic by going to the Federal Level
to sue Pacifica.
What is astonishing is the Tribune ran the
self-serving opposition press release without bothering to seek opposing
views of people who support the Highway 1 widening. The article does
not even state who the writer of this article is! What kind of
journalism is that?
Also note the
Center for Biological Diversity
is apparently part of this lawsuit. This is the same group who
participated in the suit to close the golf course. An attorney group
who is out of Arizona that we as taxpayers get to pay (win, lose or
draw) for suing us. Thank you Peter Loeb, Hal Bohner, Center for
Biological Diversity and
the No Group who should look for ways to work
with the city to solve problems instead of constantly suing."
Posted by Kathy Meeh
No comments:
Post a Comment