No City Council or Planning Commission meetings this week: City of Pacifica Calendar, week of 10/31/16 - 11/5/16.
| Halloween after the rain, without the cloud cover. |
Wednesday, November 2, 2016, 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM, Beautification Advisory Committee Meeting. Pacifica Police Deparment - EOC Conference Room. Boards, Commissions and Committees, Beautification Advisory Committee.
| Got cat treats? Tommy is staying in. |
Wednesday, November 2, 2016, 7:00 PM, SFO Community Roundtable Regular Meeting, David Chetcuti Community Room – Millbrae City Hall, 450 Poplar Avenue – Millbrae, CA 94030. Millbrae City Hall, 450 Poplar Avenue, Millbrae, CA, 94030. Event Type: Regular meeting, General Community. Agenda: Regular Agenda, Items 5, SFO Fly Quiet Report for Q 3 2016; Item 7, Roundtable response to FAA initiative results to address noise concerns.More information on SFO Roundtable website. Event map, click here.
Related, holiday. Crunchpics.com,"35 Fabulous and Scary Halloween Pictures." "Halloween is an event, a yearly one, that is associated with Christian religion and is celebrated across the world in almost every Christian country on 31st October. The basic thought behind this event is to remember all the dead one especially pious saints and martyrs. People used to defeat death and all its bad and scary aspects with feasts and parties. They arrange dinners and feasts make and wear costumes regarding the festival and try to make their selves happy in order to ensure them that death is not as scary as it seems to be." Note graphics. Bat from Free web headers/Halloween; Cat from the related Crunchpics article (above).
Posted by Kathy Meeh
25 comments:
The plot thickens. Mary Ann's Facebook and re-election website wiped clean!
123, no surprise from you, but rumor, fantasy, and wrong! See Facebook/Mary Ann Nihart for Pacifica City Council. And try the Facebook link, possibly on your own Stegink (stink) website. Even try Google, an easy solution for any tech genius.
Additionally, official Mary Ann Nihart City Council candidate information is available from our SM County government Voter's Edge website: "My 3 top priorities: 1) Increase affordable housing; 2) stabilize our shoreline and protect our environment, 3) improve our infrastructure."
These essential 3 City safety priorities are needed. And most of us do support such protective priorities, as well as the City Council Goals, adopted at City Council 10/24/16, pdf pages 5.
Mary Ann has issued a press release saying she is out of the race.
348, yeah, well why is that "press release" only on your (stink) website at this time?
"Pacifica, CA: Today, Mary Ann Nihart, current Pacifica City Council member and candidate for reelection, announced that she is withdrawing from the 2016 City Council race in order to avoid a violation of the federal Hatch Act....However, early in October, an anonymous complaint was filed against my candidacy and further evaluation of the Pacifica City Council race resulted in my receipt of a “cure” letter. In this letter, Ana Galindo Marrone, Chief of the Hatch Act Unit, Office of Special Counsel...Accordingly, this letter serves as notice that OSC has reasonable grounds to conclude that your current candidacy in the partisan election for Pacifica City Council is in violation of the Hatch Act...Throughout the past month and a half I have worked diligently to be able to remain in the Pacifica City Council race. I have received the support of many other elected officials throughout the County and in the State, but in the end I have been forced to make a very difficult and troubling choice. Effective immediately, I am withdrawing from consideration as a candidate for the Pacifica City Council.
Kathy, your wrong once again. It's posted over on Riptide also.
The press release is on Nextdoor and Riptide and the Tribune has it.
The NOBY's are doing circle dances around their cauldrons. Their chants and sacrifices have been acknowledged by the Great Red Legged Toad. They are now free to fuck up Pacifica for another 12 years. For Sale By Owner signs are selling out fast.
dis broomstick won't fly nomo.
Let's all take a moment and bow heads for the death of Pacifica!! Mary Ann was a good council member and one of the most level headed people we had. With now Martin, Digre possibly Duffy and Keener on the council Pacifica is doomed for years to come.
The Nimby's, Nobies et all have all they ever wanted.
Pacifica is screwed up already, thanks to Nihart and her developer buddies who fowled up Fassler Hill, still a scar on the landscape, visible from most of Pacifica.
Oh Gawd, not ANOTHER teary-eyed proclamation of hail fellow, well met - here is your laurel and hardy handshake and a box of chocolates. Please, just exit, stage left... make like a leaf and blow.
vote for nihart. The hatch act entanglement only applies to not campaigning. She can take office. Don’t let over the hill democratic manipulation and partisan politics throw this election to deirdre martin
@ 9:32, I hope you are right as I already voted for her.
8:40
You are the posterchild for assholes who support NOBY rule in Pacifica.
You need to thank Nancy Hall and her idiot clan of experts on everything for the abortion on Fassler.
Do a little research you brain dead sycophant.
10:12...your asshole seems to be leading your brain again. The only thing Nancy and clan had do do with that project was negotiating the LEED standards which the developer offered, then couldn't meet. Why don't you blame the bankers who financed this shitcape or will you blame the post office for mailing the bill? Your amazing stupidity is typical of why the world laughs at Pacifica. Do us all a favor and STFU.
If elected she will not be legally able to serve. Had she withdrawn in a timely manner putting the voter ahead of her personal interest then we could have voted accordingly. As it is a vote for her will tabulated but she is scratched from this race.
1133, not exactly-- in fact not at all. As with most maimed and failed development in this City over 35 years, NIMBIES interfered with every design component of the Harmony@1 project. Hence, delays, development limitations, compounded developer expenses-- that's the game: chase away, and/or bankrupt the developer.
Awesome, all this permanent empty space. No balanced City economy; and anything that represents a City infrastructure remedy, the twisted campaign of NO goes into action.
From pacifica.shitty
"EDITOR'S NOTE: We thank this council member for their service."
Stegkook cannot even mention Mary Ann's name unless unloading on her character etc.
Be happy all of you Hippees!! No growth, no money for services, bad streets and bad actors!!!
The faux-enviro NOBY's are the enemies of Pacifica.
Their mantra: "I got mine, fuck all you inferior people".
Well, Dirty Dan, your heart must be palpitating. Your "breaking" news is old as is your snide remarks and know it all demeanor.
Your vote for Nihart is not wasted. If she wins the election, she can't take the seat which leaves it vacant. Council then can appoint her to fill the seat.
Remember
VOTE FOR MARY ANN NIHART FOR COUNCIL
9:32 AM,
The Hatch Act site at the OSC says that a covered employee "may not be a candidate for nomination or election to public office in a partisan election."
Since Nihart is prevented from becoming a candidate, any vote for her won't count.
I'm not a Nihart fan, but this is a shame because I believe the will of the people is really being subverted here, since I think she'll end up STILL getting enough votes needed (unless they remove her name from in-person ballots using a sticker or strike-thru).
Nihart is a legal candidate in this race. Her votes will be tabulated and be valid. Her statement, per Hatch act, is she has to stop running. Myself and thousands of other voters will vote for Nihart due to her superior record. Also don't want martin to benefit from martin's shameless showboating of this democratic partisan manipulation of our election. Nihart wins, martin loses, pacifica gains a better city council.
Nihart is a legal candidate in this race.
No, no she's not. What do you think the whole point of the OSC's ruling and Nihart's own announcement was about? Nihart has removed herself as a candidate because she's legally prevented from being one.
She is not a candidate and is no longer running for the position. She has officially withdrawn from the race. She can win 100% of the vote and still could not serve, because she is officially out of the race and is no longer a candidate. Just like if you or I won 100% of some fluke write-in vote, we would not become city councilmembers because we're not candidates.
You can't be elected city concilmember if you're not a candidate.
Repeat the above 10000 times or until it sinks in.
Hear hear 3:59. Your vote for Nihart is more important then ever. This intrusion (if that is all it is) needs to be answered with a resounding vote for Nihart and Vaterlaus. keep our council working for all of Pacifica.
Post a Comment