Sunday, September 30, 2012

Candidate Questionnaire: What are your thoughts on the development of the old sewer plant site, Palmetto Main Street, and the new library?


The Pacifica Chamber of Commerce submitted 12 questions to each of the candidates for Pacifica City Council. Every week we will be posting two questions, and the answers from each of the candidates.

Question 6 : What are your thoughts on the development of the old sewer plant site, Palmetto Main Street, and the new library?


Susan Vellone - 4 Year Seat

Great idea. We need an infusion of foot traffic for the Palmetto Business District. As a sole proprietor I would consider investing my capital in a thriving community district. Plans are moving forward to entitle the property which will appeal to future developers. This welcome change may quell the fears of progress with concerned citizens and keeping dialogue open is a must. 



Karen Ervin – 4 Year Seat

I am fully supportive of the development of the old wastewater treatment plant and the Palmetto streetscaping project. This is an excellent idea and will provide a much-needed boost to our revenues as well as enhance our quality of life here in Pacifica. Currently the sewer plant site is an eyesore; I would love to see the creation of a state of the art library with a hotel, convention center, retail shops and restaurants linked to a revitalized Palmetto. This accomplishment will also demonstrate to other businesses outside of Pacifica that we have the wherewithal to see envisioned projects through to completion and we are welcoming to new establishments that make Pacifica a better place to live. I see this project as a definite indication that the city is moving in the right direction and would encourage this proactive stance in future endeavors.


Mary Ann Nihart – 4 Year Seat

While I cannot vote on these issues due to the location of my home, I have long been involved in organizing merchants and property owners on Palmetto, and supporting the process with the library. I served on the West Sharp Park Advisory committee, which helped design the streetscape. I love the economically-driven proposal we are moving forward for the Beach Blvd property itself, and look forward to supporting a bond measure to build the library. We have completed the new sewer mains; laid the pipes for the recycled watering of landscape; prepared the businesses; and will begin the actual undergrounding of the utilities shortly after the 2012 Fog Fest. I can visualize the vibrant street in 2018 and am excited by the possibilities!


Mike O'Neill - 2 Year Seat

I fully support a new library for Pacifica. We need to have a rallying point for our community to get behind and show the civic pride I know we have. Many people I talk to speak of the pride we in our schools and I want the same pride for the City of Pacifica as we have for the Pacifica School District. The return on investment of a new library is 4 to 1 meaning every dollar spent returns four in economic activity. The present design concept which has been discussed at several public meetings will be the economic anchor for the Palmetto Business District.

I think we also need to think of Palmetto Ave as the Main Street of a business district. We need to maximize the  (
The rest of the Dialogue of Mike has been lost.)


Rich Campbell - 2 Year Seat

 - Develop the old sewer site as contemplated by City.

 - New Library should be built as contemplated by Library Foundation. It is a economic engine.


Victor Spano - 2 Year Seat


Mr. Leland (the Beach Blvd. consultant), is an excellent planner, but he is not a commercial real estate broker. I worry the City could be disappointed with the results of the RFQ. It needs to be marketed by a professional broker. I feel the site lays out adjacent to the promenade like the Biltmore Four Seasons in Montecito / Santa Barbara. http://www.fourseasons.com/santabarbara/ I personally would like to see something like that. Let's "Shoot for the Stars" here. The proximity to the Golf Course and Ocean makes it a spectacular opportunity.

I support the new Library. Having a strong fiscal picture for our local government here will enable the City to more cost effectively sell bonds for its construction. The library will become a traffic and customer drawing magnet for Palmetto Avenue, or in other words an "anchor". I am hoping that there will be some "night life" that will develop as part of and outside the new library along Palmetto. I feel that Burlingame Avenue or Laurel Avenue in San Carlos are analogs for what Palmetto Avenue can become. We first need to fill the vacant shops and vacant lots....We need to create interest in strolling Palmetto as a "pedestrian friendly" place with early evening events like Downtown Redwood City: Movie Nights, Music, Dance. Perhaps Spindrift and Art Guild can bring events to Palmetto as well. The new Library can serve as a focal point for activity during both day and night. I want to directly contact the owners of the vacant lots and invite them to either develop them on their own, or as part of joint ventures as alternatives to letting them languish indefinitely at prices that have not been accepted by the market and might not be for a long time.


Gary Mondfrans - 2 Year Seat

Palmetto Avenue renown as central to the Fog Fest can and should become Pacifica's "Main Street" and attract even more of the antiques and collectable businesses and other similar businesses which proliferate and draw tourists and visitors to the area. Distinctive themed development into an historic lighting district utilizing turn of the (last) century (1880's) style lighting and lamp fixtures similar to the way that the old street cars and cable cars draw tourists and visitors to San Francisco should be considered. Core to such development will be use of the former sewage treatment plant consistent with other west Sharp Park business and proximity to the Pier. What will ultimately be decided with respect to the destiny of the adjacent Sharp Park Golf Course will also have an substantial impact on the area. Both sites are valuable commodities and all viable alternatives must be explored so that the residents and taxpayers of Pacifica are not short-changed nor overly impacted. Promotion for development of the former treatment plant can be utilized through creative “web”ertising and RFPs (Requests for Proposals). As the Sharp Park Pier is the only pier in the Bay Area where Dungeoness crabbing is permitted thus making the pier not only a popular draw throughout the area, but something which can be exploited like Fisherman Wharf did in San Francisco. Improvements to the library should be on their on merits and not made a requirement of any specific proposal.

Pacifica needs to attract more of the kinds of businesses that will in turn attract tourist and visitors to Pacifica. Just as Martinez is known as an antiques and collectables center for the East Bay so can Pacifica which is just a few minutes south of San Francisco. Already many tourists and visitors are finding us through our existing hotels and the RV Park on Palmetto. Further promotion and outreach through interaction and advertising is the key. I'll bet few have even seen or heard about the advertising supplement which the San Francisco Examiner distributed last week in their "Discover Pacifica" edition. Fortunately additional copies will be printed and promoted at the Fog Fest. Each and every one of us can also help our neighboring businesses and those who work there by "Shopping Pacifica First".


26 comments:

Anonymous said...

The writing is on the wall. Spano, is our guy, he knows how local city government works. He does this every day. He knows real estate. He knows the major players in the business.

If you want the same vote for the hold hands and chant for money to fall out of the sky group.

If you want the town to prosper vote for Spano!

Anonymous said...

Well Spano certainly wins the "we can dream" prize. The Santa Barbara Biltmore? Burlingame and Laurel Aves? A magic magnet library buzzing with bookworms by day and vibrant nightlife after dark. Yeah, sure. If we're going to dream, let's dream really big and buy and raze the whole area from Beach Blvd to the hiway and Clarendon to Paloma and have an oceanfront district developers would actually be interested in. We can't, so we piddle around with stuff that won't make a bit of difference on the city's balance sheet although the immediate neighbors should appreciate the effort. Points to development expert Spano for pie in the sky and mentioning a broker, but no cigar.

Anonymous said...

I would like to see a new library and city hall in the old WWTP. I don't want to see a hotel. This is a residential area within close proximity to a school. Hotels should stay in the Rockaway district. I am voting for Vellone and O'Neil. I voted for Len Stone. Stone is doing what I voted him in to do. Ervin is weak and weak on experience. Nihart , well, let's just say I have been watching her and she is ok.

Steve Sinai said...

"While I cannot vote on these issues due to the location of my home,"

This rule is being applied to the point of absurdity. There needs to be a way to bypass it under certain circumstances, e.g., the rest of the council can vote to waive the rule for particular votes.

Anonymous said...

Isn't there still an active pump on the site? I do believe so and it has to stay. Now there's a feature the Santa Barbara Biltmore doesn't have. It doesn't have that rusty old sewer outfall pipe either or the pigs on the pier. This is a compromised site in a very funky neighborhood. Elder hostel? Sure. Luxury hotel? You must be running for office.

Anonymous said...

O'Neill and Vellone, yes! I'd dump Nihart in a heartbeat if there was one more strong candidate. It's not Ervin.

Anonymous said...

@1249 I have always believed that there is a lot of discretion used by council when they decide to recuse themselves. Not all conflicts of interest are real. Politics can too often be part of the equation. With the Palmetto improvements, the project applies to an entire area. What is the individual benefit/loss? What is the perspective? Is it a bona fide ethical and legal concern that drives the recusal or just a need to be bullet proof?

Anonymous said...

@123 If by politics you mean self-preservation, oh yes. Some are slyer politicians than others.

Anonymous said...

Ya Pete had a fit when he couldn't sit on the oddstad assisted living center. Glad we exposed him for the fraud he is.

Vreeland had a lot of issues he never reclused hisself on
Buying lots in Pedro point. The highway one bridge.

But Cecilia said it was ok

Anonymous said...

Bulloney.

Anonymous said...

@447 less recusals, not more, OK?
And make it the city attorney's decision not that of the individual councilmember.

Anonymous said...

Cecilia tried every bull shit excuse trying to get Pete, to vote on the senior housing. His Mom lives on Toledo court owns the house in her trust and Pete is the beneficary of the trust.

Anonymous said...

Cecilia? She's back? Anyhow, wouldn't he have welcomed the opportunity to vote against the assisted-living facility? Seems like. Unless he felt he could not be fair about the project and withdrew on that basis. Who knows? I don't and neither do you. The project passed and now we just have to hope they got the money together.

Anonymous said...

Cecilia left they canned her.

You don't know sneaky Pete well. When he gets mad or cant do something or get hisnway. He avoids coming to the next meeting. Talk about childish behavior. He never grew up.

When I told Cecilia that Pete's mom lived on Toledo court she asked me. Did she donate money to his campaign. Seriously Cecilia why aren't you working at a walmart

Anonymous said...

Well that explains that, thanks.

Anonymous said...

I thought Pete's mom funded his campaign. oh never mind, maybury and butler did not write about it so it never happened.

Anonymous said...

Susan Vellone - 4 Year Seat

Great idea. We need an infusion of foot traffic for the Palmetto Business District. As a sole proprietor I would consider investing my capital in a thriving community district. Plans are moving forward to entitle the property which will appeal to future developers. This welcome change may quell the fears of progress with concerned citizens and keeping dialogue open is a must.

This ding dong doesn't even get it. She spent all the capital already!

Anonymous said...

Nice try councilman, try another remedy of dis-satifaction. Vellone has the moxy to stand up to you!

Anonymous said...

Ok people listen up.

If you really truly 100% want change for Pacifica, vote for Spano. If you want more hippie, dirty, dusty bankrupt city, with a broken down infrastructure and roads falling apart, sewer system failing and one lawsuit or big El Nino winter away from total collapse vote for the other candidates.

Remember the hippies are 100% responsible for the destruction of the town.

For the last 30 years everyone had the idea how to "fix pacifica" but it has been the same old grants and handouts. Well people the Federal Government and State have no money. The county laughs at Pacifica cause they know they can not govern the city.

If the town has to file bankruptcy, the hippies will just run and hide and not come out. Or they will blame it on Prop 13 like Fred Howard does. Or the State closing the Redevelopment Agencies.

Pacifica, deserves much much better then the dirty, dusty, broken down city it has become.

In fact our council man who flew the coup and quit, used to say, "it was a shithole"

nyuk nyuk said...

A shithead calling Pacifica a shithole. Now that's funny.

Anonymous said...

kindly remove the 2 comments above. zero class. off topic.

Anonymous said...

yes remove any posts about V******d. he did so much for us. and now he has turned into Jim Morrison.

Anonymous said...

As a sole proprietor I would consider investing my capital in a thriving community district

LMAO Imaginary capital. Rich very rich.

Anonymous said...

The slate is busy again. Filth.

Anonymous said...

ABC=Anyone BUT Campbell!!!!

Anonymous said...

Vellone needs to get some of Pete 's dope. It will calm her down