Attend in person, 2212 Beach Boulevard, 2nd floor. Or, view on local television or live feed Pacificcoast.TV, (formerly pct26.com). The meeting begins at 7 p.m., or shortly there following. City council updates and archives are available on the City website.
| Item 12. Warm California sun, and surf's up |
CA government code 54957.6. Conference with labor negotiator. Agency Negotiator: Glen Berkheimer. Firefighters Local 2400, Battalion Chiefs Local 856, Department Directors Local 350. Wastewater Treatment Plant Employees Local 856. Miscellaneous Local 856. Managers Local 350. Police Officers Association, Supervisors, Management Local 350.
Open Session, 7:00 p.m.
Consent Calendar
1. Approval of City Council Minutes, 6/23/14.
2. Continuing 4/7/10 proclamation of a cliff erosion at 380 and 400 Esplanade Avenue. Photos, 7-2-14.3. Adoption of the amended ordinance concerning alarm systems 6/23/14, second reading.
4. Resolution request to submit proposal for 2014/15 STEM program grant funding 8/1/14-8/31/15. $38,681 (50% in-kind match, 9% administrative cost paid to the city). Summary, Resolution.
5. Resolution approving CA Dept of Education $608,337 subsidized child care and child development services contracts, FY 2014-15, (no additional budget affect). Summary, Resolution.
6. Approve continued Pacifica School District lease of $142,272, for child care services rental space, FY 2014-15. Summary.
7. Approve business liquor licenses (on sale and off sale), 1237 Linda Mar Shopping Center. (Application requirement: City and the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Summary.
8. Approve Bonds signature replacement, City Manager, and Administrative Services Director cards. Summary.
9. Approve tree maintenance services with Professional Tree Care Company, $78,210 + emergency work not to exceed $150,000, FY 2014-15. Summary.
10. Approve Esplanade Storm Drain Outfall Trash Capture Devices Project, Cratus, Inc. contractor, $188,100. The CalEMA 500 Esplanade grant pays 75% eligible project cost + 10% administrative cost. City match NPDES Stormwater Fund 16 to Disaster Related Fund 38, FY 2014/15. Summary.
11. Approve construction inspection and management of Linda Mar Boulevard repavement (from Highway 1 through Adobe Drive) to , G. Bortolotto & Co, Inc., Street Construction Fund 09, $80,524. Summary.
Consideration
12. Resolution to adopt Climate Action Plan (CAP), consistent with CA Assembly Bill, AB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05. Summary. a. City/County Action Plan 12/3/13, DCAP with 5/13/14 update, 93 pages. b. DCAP Update, 5/13/14. c. Initial CAP study, Negative Declaration 6/11/14.
Adjourn
Related - City Budget Funds, which includes the Final Operating Budget, 2014/15, 84 pages. Fund numbers and their projected expenditures described in the Final budget, pages 17-21.
Disclosures: Most links are pdf files. FY year refers to the City Fiscal Year July 1 through June 30. Any updates, additions or corrections to the above information please advise. Any presentation complaints, well a new volunteer effort is awaiting you. Note USA climate change graphic: From NOAA Climate.gov, "Climate and Peanut Butter" drought conditions article, 11/1/12.
Posted by Kathy Meeh
10 comments:
What is #8 about? Bond signatures? I read the odd little staff explanation which basically says 'go figure'. Seems like an opportunity to educate us. The new bank wants an updated signature card. Why? When would a signature be required? Under what specific circumstances? Guess I've grown suspicious. Go figure.
Watch your wallet!! Recology is coming to city council for another rate increase.
Anonymous 8:34 AM Had your coffee yet? Where does it say Recology is coming in for an increase? Not all discussion of trash automatically reflects on Recology and if you put your memory helmet on, there has been no trash increase since Jan 2013 but if there is contination of customers mixing their trash within their recycling and/or compost carts and negating the revenues we receive for these commodities because of contaminated loads (thus causing a charge for disposal as opposed to revenue for recycling)financial shortfalls may occur. People on the different blogs have bragged about doing this so they could subscribe to the smallest can and I quote said "it was our problem to sort it out" but unfortunately they are very shortsighted (or just don't care) because it will be all the rate payers problem of which I and all my employees who live in Pacifica are.
Chris can I ask you why Recology of San Francisco does not require clients to tie up their cardboard? They also allow people to use the bio bags for green waste. Just wondering why there's a difference in policy.
Also what kind of garbage is ending up in the recycling? Maybe we need a refresher?
LMAO. Item #10 uses the word 'trash' as in a Storm Drain Outfall Trash Capture Device. Whatever that is. Maybe we're all just a little sensitive. Shape up that re-cycling.
ROTC brings their compost to a different facility than RSF and our processor does not allow bio bags. Customers are putting everything and anything in the middle of their recycling/compost carts to keep from paying for the appropriate garbage cart. This is causing a loss of recycling income and an increase in disposal fees.
Which is setting us up for another rate increase.
We'll all piss and moan if the cost is passed along to the rate payer, but no company can be expected to absorb a loss for long. It's not a charity.
Chris if certain people are purposely putting garbage in the compost bin it should be easy for the driver to see when he dumps it no? You should know what rout it's on. The old days they used to tag you.
Everyone shouldn't be penalized for a few people cheating. Work to identify these people and charge them extra. There must be suspicions of who it is.
And how about the cardboard tied? Why do we have to do it when other Recology cities don't?
Whoa. I've never tied my cardboard. We just cut it up any cardboard boxes and put the pieces neatly in the recycle bin. Is this wrong? I can take the truth about my cardboard. Experts only, please.
Post a Comment