Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Special City Council meeting tonight, reoganization

City of Pacifica, City Council meeting, 12/14/16, pdf pages 2.  Open Session, 7:00 pm, call to order roll call.  
Image result for semi happy party, picture
After meeting, hope for wisdom

City Council special order of business.
1.  Welcoming remarks, Mayor Digre.
2.  Outgoing Mayor remarks.
3.  Presentation to outgoing Mayor.
4.  Presentations to outgoing councilmembers.
5.  Oath of Office to newly elected councilmembers.
6.  Selection of new Mayor
7.  Selection of new Mayor Pro Tem.
8.  Incoming Mayor's remarks.
9.  Adjournment followed by refreshments.
Adjourn.  
----------
Reference - City of Pacifica, City Council.    Note photograph. Owl, "Labella Vita" posted on Pinterest.

Posted by Kathy Meeh

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Shameless NOBY's will be congratulating themselves on a successful coupe to flip the council majority back to "Nothing for Pacifica".
These creepy hypocrits and faux-enviros have no concience about stripping Pacifica voters of a very effective councilperson Nihart in order to install their illegitament puppet, Deirdre Martin. Shame, Shame, Shame. One day you will all be found out and we will get our town back.

Anonymous said...

How do shameless NObies look at themselves in the mirror?
Same way Trump does!

Anonymous said...

deirdre's handlers---a legitimacy problem!
From: "Cynthia Kaufman"
Date: Nov 2, 2016 9:25 AM
Subject: Deirdre for Council Campaign Update
To: "Deirdre Martin"

Dear Deirdre for Council Supporter-
By now you have probably heard that Mary Ann Nihart has said that she has withdrawn from the city council race. She did this because as a federal employee, she is not allowed to run in a partisan election, and the election became partisan once the San Mateo County Democrats endorsed. If anyone asks you about this, a fuller statement is on the web site under "Campaign News".
There is a lot of uncertainty about the implications of Mary Ann's withdraw, but one thing is clear: we still need to do a serious Get Out the Vote effort. We don’t want Deirdre’s legitimacy to be undermined as a council member if she comes in third and only gets onto the council because of Mary Ann’s disqualification. We want to be able to say loud and clear that we won this election because of our position on the issues, and Deirdre’s strength as a candidate.
Deirdre and Cynthia

Anonymous said...

Nice try Deirdre Martin and Cynthia Kaufman. You knew this was a "voter suppression" scheme that was getting traction with low info voters and your hypocritical supporters. To put out this phoney "We are really good guys but we need to secure a majority for appearance sake" message, right before the election shows how corrupt and unethical you really are. You knew what was about to happen but you lacked the integrity to be straight with the community. Henceforth you will always be known as the "illegitament council person" who stole the election, caused the loss of a very skilled Councilperson Nihart and pedals lies and obfuscation at the behest of your puppet masters. As you no doubt have discovered, voter suppression works in the short term but don't count on it lasting very long. People outside of your faux-enviro cult are not as stupid as you think they are.

Anonymous said...

In her previous election I've heard Nihart was able to skirt the Hatch Act because Ervin agreed not to seek the Demos endorsement. Canny political move, if so. Smart. You think she asked Martin? Huh? Yeah, neither do I. There's your problem. All good things must come to an end, sometimes an inglorious end.

Anonymous said...

our fake councilmember gets sworn in tonight. Come eat cake.

Anonymous said...

2:04 Who'd you hear it from Dan?

Anonymous said...

Dan? Oh, Dan the Boogieman of Pacifica Politics? Sorry dude, no Dan here. And, don't you go leaping to more of your conclusions. He's not off bombing Aleppo or giving Trump a sponge bath.

Anonymous said...

5:07 Name the source of the Mary Ann/Karen Ervin Hatch Act agreement.
I doubt if you can because you're are a full of shit NOBY, happy to celebrate your illegitament puppet councilwoman.

Steve Sinai said...

"In her previous election I've heard Nihart was able to skirt the Hatch Act because Ervin agreed not to seek the Demos endorsement."

Nihart wasn't working for the federal government in her previous election.

Anonymous said...

The source of the Mary Ann Nihart/Karen Ervin Hatch act agreement is Mary Ann herself. And Karen confirmed it. Mary Ann was a federal employee when she and Karen both ran for election.

Anonymous said...

711 This was Niharts third election. In the first there was no Hatch Act issue because she was not a federal employee, however, in the second (the one in which Ervin also ran and no one sought the Dems endorsement) she was a federal employee. And of course in the 2016 election she was again a federal employee.

507 Hilarious. Thanks for the laugh--ever so enjoyable b/c I didn't vote for Martin. I would have if I'd known she was, as you say, "illegitament" (sic) because it's not fair to blame a child for the circumstances of its birth. And, there are so many bastards.

Anonymous said...

Mary Ann and Karen actually did seek the Dems endorsement, along with Rich Campbell. After receiving the endorsement both Rich and Mary Ann had to decline due to the Hatch Act and asked Karen to do the same - which she did. During this election, Sue (also a registered Dem) and Mary Ann declined to seek the endorsement due to the Hatch Act. Confirm it with anyone of them, it isn't that complicated.

Anonymous said...

726 I don't doubt what you say. The pieces fit. Sought and received the blessing, but didn't use it and Ervin didn't spoil the party in 2012. Love to see our politicians playing well together. Did anyone ask Martin to play along before it was too late?

Anonymous said...

Don't know the answer to your question, 1:06, but we might be able to infer things based on the actions of her supporters. I'm thinking specifically of the serial liars like Stink Man and crew who insisted that you couldn't vote for Nihart and that a vote for her wouldn't count. Do you really think this group would take the high road?

By the way, it was beautiful to see Stink Man get a dressing down in front of a standing room only crowd by Nihart last night. You should have seen all the peeps staring daggers at him. The dude's reputation is toast.

Anonymous said...

Martin was not asked to play along until after the endorsement was made. Then Mary Ann called in the big guns to put pressure on the Dems to rescind the endorsement. The Dems refused. Meanwhile, Martin's mailers with the Dem endorsement were printed and mailed.

3:58 You obviously attended a different meeting than the one I did last night.

Anonymous said...

Whatever you say, Danny. You were sitting up with Spano. We were in the back where we could see the nudging and pointing in your direction while Nihart was calling you out on your shit. A number of us also commented on how fast you disappeared as soon as the meeting was over. Like a puff of smoke from burnt toast.

Anonymous said...

everyone talks but Deirdre. The fake winner.

Anonymous said...

518 That's the story I heard on the Great Hatch Escape of 2016. Nihart knew how to play the game because she'd played it before and for unknown reason failed to do what she needed to do when she needed to do it. Pivotal moment missed. Sabotaged herself. Go figure.
BTW 358 has been attending a different meeting all his life. His creative descriptions of these events are fake news and positively Trumpian.