Anticipated City litigation (parties and cause) are not stated on this City Council Closed Session Agenda; and, the City is not commenting further. Any Agenda allowed public comments would likely be known only by those who are informed and affected by the litigation. If you know about this lawsuit and wish to share, please let us know, thanks!
 |
| Anticipated City lawsuit? ... "We're all ears!" |
City Council Closed Session 4/5/17, 4:30 p.m.
Call to order, roll call, Closed Session Report, probably none.
Public comments for Closed Session Item Only.
Conference with legal council, anticipated litigation, significant. CA Government Code Section CA code section 54956.9, (d) (2). Conference with legal council, significant anticipated litigation.
"(d) For purposes of this section, litigation shall be considered pending when any of the following circumstances exist: (2) A point has been reached where,
in the opinion of the legislative body of the local agency on the advice
of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there
is a significant exposure to litigation against the local agency." (CA Government Code explanation from Find Law.)
Consent
Calendar, none. Special Presentation, none. Public Hearings, none.
Council Communications, none. Oral Communications, none. Consideration,
none.
Adjourn.
--------------------
Note photograph from MW News/Moroccans of the World,"We're all ears!"
Note photograph from MW News/Moroccans of the World,"We're all ears!"
Posted by Kathy Meeh
5 comments:
".....there is a significant exposure to litigation."
These are the things that can break a city already on the edge of extinction.
Wonder if the brain trust of Keener, Deirdre and Digre have a clue.
Their puppet masters sure do and this is a perfect piece of their game plan.
I couldn't find anything at the county about a major litigation. What's up? Maybe dom Stegnunk can start an investigation.
"significant exposure to litigation" is standard boilerplate language for closed session. It could be somebody fell and broke their nose on city property or it could be something much more. The "significant exposure" doesn't tell you anything.
8:45 AM What makes you the expert on this matter Dan?
8:45, there's nothing "standard boilerplate" about calling a special wednesday closed session meeting about it
Post a Comment