This
letter has been sent to defend our highway funding, directed to the two
county agencies funding the project. All Pacifica commuters and
taxpayers should be concerned that this city council
will abandon our highway widening funding without a timely public vote.
San Mateo County Transportation Authority
Jim Harnett, CEO
1250 San Carlos Ave.
San Carlos, CA 94070-1306
San Carlos, CA 94070-1306
City/County Assoc. of Governments
Sandy Wong Executive Director
San Mateo County Office Building
555 County Center,
Fifth Floor
Redwood City, Ca.
94063 April 12, 2017
Re: Pacifica Hwy 1 safety widening statement for both Boards of Directors, via email.
I
represent a Pacifica organization of concerned citizens which is
vitally interested in the proposed Hwy 1 widening to improve our
horrible AM and PM commute. I urge both organizations to keep
the $4 million allocated for the Hwy 1 widening work in the
transportation plan. We cannot allow this current Pacifica council
majority to break faith with Pacifica voters and abandon the project
funding.
Pacifica
voters overwhelmingly supported the sales tax increase specifically for
transportation in the 2004 Measure A vote. Hwy 1 is a critical
north-south arterial, the only way out of town
for over half of Pacifica residents. Hwy 1 carries coast-side
commuters, tourists, other commerce and emergency vehicles—all of which
are caught in this one mile bottleneck. Hwy 1 is a regional highway that
deserves the full support of the funding agencies.
The Pacifica Council passed a resolution
stating Hwy 1 widening will only be supported if the public votes to do
so. We have called for an election to determine if the public supports
the widening. We
expect the election decision to be made at the Council’s April 24 meeting. We
also expect the question to be on the June 2018 primary ballot so a
larger cross-section of the community will debate and vote on the
matter.
We
do not expect this new Council majority to ask that the $4 million be
protected. In fact without a public vote, they will probably delay
until all funding expires. But again, Pacifica voters
supported transportation funding through Measure A and will continue to
pay the sales tax increase for another 16 years. If Hwy 1 widening
funding is cut, Pacifica taxpayers keep paying but the funding goes to
other towns in the county.
Therefore
we urge both agencies to wait about pulling the Hwy 1 funding.
Pacifica commuters and taxpayers must have the final say with a public
vote.
Sincerely
Jim Wagner, chair
Pacifica Business and Community
PAC.
7 comments:
"We do not expect this new Council majority to ask that the $4 million be protected."
We do not expect this new, UNELECTED Council majority to ask that the $4 million be protected.
Fixed it for you.
Liar
And WHEN the public vote rules against the widening. Will this site FINALLY shut tfu about this?
The only reason the NIMBYS have a council majority is because Martin sought the endorsement of the county Democrats, which turned the council election from non-partisan to partisan. The Hatch Act says federal employees can't run in partisan elections, so VA employee Mary Ann Nihart was forced to drop out after Martin's supporters kept appealing to the government agency that oversees the Hatch Act.
Martin guaranteed herself a spot on council by gaming the election rules rather than letting Pacifica voters decide.
5:39
Keep saying it over and over again. I am sure she chuckles every time she reads it.
If your not cheating or working the angles, your clearly not trying hard enough.
I'm sure that slimy, lying little ***** chuckles every time she reads it. It doesn't change the fact that Deirdre and her puppet masters are unethical cheaters.
KARMA got Vreeland, it will get YOU.
Karma's got a notch in her belt for Nihart, too.
Post a Comment