Monday, October 26, 2009

Ah, as much as things change, they stay the same


part of a conversation i had with a former finance director.
almost 2 1/2 years later. pathetic.
Wagner

Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:51:00 -0700


Of course, we could use the ABAG money...Let me start again with the definition of a "structural" deficit....keeping in mind that wages and benefits for the service provided in the City account for nearly 80% of total spending.  A structural deficit is defined as...in any given year the expenditures exceed the revenue.  So, yes, of course, we could use the ABAG money to close the deficit this new fiscal year ...but, it is one time money...(reimbursed from previous years expenditures),  it could help us "balance" the budget this year by using this one time money to cover our operating expenses...but we would be back in the same place next year with a structural deficit because we would not have solved the "structural" problem.  The only way to actually solve the structural problem is to cut expenditures and/or increase revenues.  We are making attempts to do both right now.  Unfortunately, because the cost of staffing to provide services is the majority of our expenditures....the cost cutting has to involve reducing staffing and thus reducing the services that are provided by that staffing.  We are also looking at revenue enhancements:  For instance, we are looking at a property tax audit of the County to make sure that Pacifica is receiving the property tax revenue correctly; we are looking at developer fees, so when we move forward with development, there will be revenue to improve infrastructure; we are looking at sewer connection fees, so that, again, as development proceeds, we can build a capital improvement reserve for all of the pump stations, sewer lines, etc. using sewer connection fees.
 
So, basically, we are taking the steps necessary right now to balance a structural deficit by cutting costs and looking for revenue.  We have already made a good start...but, again, that is mostly from not filling positions as people leave or retire...which, reduces our ability to provide services for the community.  I can assure you, that in my experience, this is one of the most thinly staffed municipalities.  We are already down to the bone.


3 comments:

Jeffrey W Simons said...

Thanks for sharing that Jim. I have a few gems from our former finance director like that. The point to emphasize is that this "thinly staffed municipality" was happening well before the global financial recession. There are council defenders who are blaming our current financial problems solely on the global market conditions. This is patently untrue.

The Little Brown Churchlady said...

"We have already made a good start...but, again, that is mostly from not filling positions as people leave or retire...which, reduces our ability to provide services for the community. I can assure you, that in my experience, this is one of the most thinly staffed municipalities. We are already down to the bone." --Juanita de Portola (Pacifica's first Finance Director; circa 1769; in her State of the City report to husband and Pacifica's first mayor, Gaspar)

Lionel Emde said...

"I can assure you, that in my experience, this is one of the most thinly staffed municipalities."
And then there was no finance director shortly thereafter.