Mercury News/Bonnie Eslinger, 2/1/12. "San Mateo County may make most of its budget deficit go away by tapping reserves again."
"San Mateo County once again faces a huge budget deficit as it heads toward a new fiscal year, this time to the tune of about $77 million. And once again county supervisors indicated during a budget discussion Tuesday that rather than bite the bullet and make drastic cuts, they'll likely choose to tap into a reserve account that is replenished annually with excess property taxes.
Cuts, cash reserves, taxes, recovery = survival success |
Only Supervisor Dave Pine challenged the recommendation, noting that given the uncertainty of state funding, the county should prepare for the worst by making necessary cuts now. "We're just going to make things more difficult," Pine said. "I just can't believe there's nothing we can cut in the fiscal year."
Maltbie
replied that each department already has been asked to look for
cost-saving efficiencies that "do not directly affect the level of local
services," such as reducing cellphone usage. Board President Adrienne Tissier said she agrees with that strategy. "I don't want to make cuts for the sake of making cuts." Maltbie said that after all the cuts made in recent
years the county can ease up next fiscal year, which begins July 1. His
memo says that since 2008, more than 500 positions have been eliminated
from the county payroll. "There comes a time in an organization where you need to catch your breath," Maltbie said. "Maybe 2013 is that time."
The
board directed staff to prepare two tax measures for the June ballot.
One would raise the hotel tax in unincorporated areas from 10 to 12
percent, for an annual revenue boost of $200,000. The other would allow
the county to charge a 2.5 percent vehicle rental tax and an 8 percent
parking lot tax in unincorporated areas, for an annual revenue boost of
$12 million.
Money funneled into the reserve account comes from property taxes the county is required by state law to collect for schools and community colleges. Although most counties distribute all that money -- known as Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (ERAF) -- San Mateo and Marin have such a high tax base they end up with millions of dollars left over each year after paying what's required to schools. This fiscal year the county received $80 million in excess property taxes."
Posted by Kathy Meeh
4 comments:
Dipping into reserves and hoping things get better when the facts clearly suggest they won't...where have we seen that before? Hope those "excess" property taxes keep rolling in.
That money should be given to the schools as it was intended refunded to taxpayers. Another example of what out of control wages and benefits are doing to every city county and state.Things are only getting worse as we now pay for 2 retired workers for every one on the job. This is unsustainable and you will soon see more cities and even counties filing bankruptcy.
This is important, as it identifies the slush fund by which San Mateo County has been able to continue its lavish spending.
The funds that the reporter refers to are supposed to be for schools, yet they end up in the deficit-plugging department. Except for Mr. Pine, the S.M. Co. supervisors are removed from reality.
This is important, as it identifies the slush fund by which San Mateo County has been able to continue its lavish spending.
The funds that the reporter refers to are supposed to be for schools, yet they end up in the deficit-plugging department. Except for Mr. Pine, the S.M. Co. supervisors are removed from reality.
Post a Comment