Economic Plan for this City, NOT - Only Taxes and More Work for You

Contrary to what you may have heard (the promises) from 7 year "friendly and nice" city council members, a real economic plan for this city never happened, and apparently was not part of the back-of-the-house consideration from this city council. You thought you elected city council members to protect your interests, other than simply giving away or selling the land, you were wrong. Don't make that mistake again, unless you actually think a failed city is a nice place to live.

The recent blog article post "Why Paul Jones Opposed to Term Limits? A Lesson in Cronyism" included the Pedro Point Headlands Hike (part 1 of 3) video, probably the best of the three. Nevertheless, I'm listing all three which describe an important "vision" for this city, not fully disclosed or understood by the general public. Did our citizens intend to give away so much productive land, was there any vote to go that direction, or were larger land owners "encouraged" (as in "hammered", blocked, driven to sell) to gift their land to "unproductive open space" and take the tax break?

Part 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvXUPlJufOk&feature=related
Part 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2kRqrWGYtA&feature=related
Part 3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9pRMAfUH0g&feature=related

As the result of "trails and the skate park... business is thriving", the GGNRA is also responsible for the "issue of dogs..." (interpreted as no dogs); the GGNRA will also be able talk about "the rail road and agriculture" (both past history)--way to go Mr. "nothing economic for Pacifica" Councilmember Vreeland!

Posted by Kathy Meeh