Avoid economic development, and don't tax us. Does this sounds familiar? Our city fees for "everything" are high, Half Moon Bay could learn from us.
Half Moon Bay Review/Mark Novack, 3/29/12. "HMB floats new sales tax idea, public outcry dooms paid parking."
Charming downtown- no parking meters |
Many of the same merchants rallied last week to urge the council to scuttle plans to charge drivers for parking downtown. “I think I heard what everyone said tonight — we’re not ready for paid parking,” said Councilwoman Marina Fraser during a public meeting March 20. “In the future, we’d like to see more community support (for a sales tax) … with the help of merchants on Main Street.”
“We’d be ruining the charm of our town by (nickel and diming) people who come here to eat and shop,” city resident Marcia Traversaro said to the council. “If you’ve gotten a ticket in a town, it just leaves a bad taste in your mouth.”
At the tail end of the meeting, council members relented and a majority seemed to back the concept of a half-cent city sales tax that could go on a future ballot. The idea was first suggested by It’s Italia restaurant owner Betsy Del Fierro, who indicated it would be a better solution for Main Street merchants. Taking up the tax idea,
Try to pass a sales tax again |
Other council members followed suit and agreed to lay to rest the paid-parking idea, but they reminded the audience more than once about the uphill battle they faced to pass a sales tax in 2010. Councilman Rick Kowalczyk, who opposed the past tax increase, admitted he was conflicted about backing a new tax. “The principle of a sales tax is counterintuitive,” he started, “But I would support it if … a significant piece was used to promote the community.”
Going into the March 20 meeting, city leaders had put their support behind paid parking downtown, saying the idea carried little risk and could actually rotate more customers into shops and restaurants. The proposal wouldn’t have come cheaply, costing the city about $500,000 in equipment and another $330,000 a year in maintenance and enforcement. Staff recommended the council charge a rate of $1.50 an hour to recoup the cost quickly."
Posted by Kathy Meeh
7 comments:
Council can not see that the problem is (like here) the high union wages and benefits.
Again, AB 506 seems to be the way forward. It allows a tax collecting agency, like a city, to restructure it's debt and labor contracts without harming the agencies bond status.
Considering HMB's financial issues AB 506 should at least be discussed and explained to it's residents and council by staff, even if AB 506 ultimately isn't the cure. At the very least the residents and elected officials will have a better understanding of options.
The source of Half Moon Bay's problem was that the local, no-growth hippies convinced the city to block Chop Keenan from developing his land by playing legal games. (Similar to the way Pacifica played games with the guy trying to develop the Fish & Bowl.)
The Chopster rightfully sued and won, and 1/3 of the town's revenues go to paying him off. HMB ended up having to disband their police department because of it.
Nice one, hippies.
With their problems they're better off with the Sheriffs and their resources. We will be, too.
Steve it was the pro growth council that decided not to appeal the judgement that has cost HMB so dearly.
If we hadn't replaced Pacifica's pro growth council in '02 I'm sure the city would have settled with Fromm costing us dearly also.
Pro growth councils cost communities lots and lots of money. Much more than your favored scape goats.
"I'm sure the city would have settled with Fromm costing us dearly.."
Todd (426), the 2002 pro-growth Pacifica city council majority 3 passed the North Pacifica LLC. The "joint and several" poison pill wording was added after they passed that development (so stated Maxine Gonsalves in her last letter-to-the-editor). Without the incoming 2002 "no growth" city council, there would not have been a court action from 2003. NIMBYS in this city have been perpetrators of our ruinous city economy, 60% unproductive "open space" speaks for itself. Such excessive "open space" is far off from suggested sustainable economic development city models.
Now what? We need economic solutions and that includes tax producing revenue growth. So don't just hit the NIMBY wall on this with default, last resort bankruptcy. Try to be part of the solution.
Todd, a pro-growth council wouldn't have blocked Keenan's development.
The chance of a successful appeal is relatively low. I don't know why the hippies are so convinced that an appeal would have been successful. If HMB lost the appeal, it would have cost the town more.
I found the following at http://www.sgrlaw.com/resources/trust_the_leaders/leaders_issues/ttl3/863/
"In fiscal 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reported a reversal rate in private civil cases of 13.9 percent. The reversal rate in private civil cases in all federal appellate courts was 11.7 percent. These reversal rates are modestly higher if you include partial reversals."
Post a Comment