The second highlighted paragraph holds a clue to a potential future refreshing tax for Pacifica.
Palo Alto Daily News/Bonnie Eslinger, 10/26/12. "Supervisor says San Mateo County isn't considering a soda tax-- at least, not yet."
|
Will this tax pass? I don't think so |
|
New City revenue, how refreshing ! |
"Although
San Mateo County eventually may consider taxing soda and other
sugar-sweetened drinks to fight obesity, no such proposal is in the
works right now, Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson said Thursday.
Jacobs
Gibson made the comments following a 2½-hour meeting in which health
officials batted around ideas for encouraging residents to reduce
consumption of sugary beverages.
The meeting included a
presentation by Richmond City Council Member Jeff Ritterman, a retired
cardiologist who was instrumental in placing a penny-per-ounce soda tax
measure on his city's Nov. 6 ballot.
Jacobs Gibson told The Daily News
after the meeting. The board of supervisors this week approved a ban of
carryout bags at stores in unincorporated areas and is counting on 24
Peninsula and South Bay cities to follow suit."
Read article.
Posted by Kathy Meeh
2 comments:
Richmond, is in the East Bay, the last time I checked?
What does this have to do with Pacifica?
Kathy, are you turning into Julie Lancelle?
Maybe Richmond can send us some of this soda money?
Post a Comment