Monday, October 29, 2012

CA election Propositions, the best investment money may buy


San Francisco Chronicle/Philip Matier and Andrew Ross, Columnists, 10/27/12. "Campaign finances getting personal."

My campaign investment
"Special-interest money is getting downright personal in this year's state election, with four mega-millionaires tossing a combined $125 million into the pot - mostly on initiatives they put on the ballot themselves.

Of the big hitters, nobody - but nobody - beats the Mungers. Molly Munger and her half brother, Charles Munger Jr. - the children of Berkshire Hathaway billionaire Charles Munger - have pumped more than $80 million into the Nov. 6 election. The biggest hitter is Molly, who has spent $44.1 million of her own money on qualifying and trying to pass Proposition 38, which would raise the state income tax to scoop up more money for schools.  But even with all that cash, the measure appears to be failing.

Just saying...
Charles Jr., a Stanford physicist with a libertarian bent, has contributed $36 million to a committee with the dual aim of defeating a competing tax measure by Gov. Jerry Brown and passing Proposition 32, which would bar unions from using members' dues for politics. Combined, the Mungers have outspent even the heavyweight California Teachers Association by more than 2-to-1.

And they aren't the only gazillionaires throwing their wallets around. Money manager and Stanford trustee Thomas Steyer has spent $29 million, with most of it going into Proposition 39 to close a corporate tax loophole in hopes of netting the state $1 billion a year. Then there's Mercury Insurance magnate George Joseph, who has forked over $16.4 million in an effort to rewrite the state's auto insurance rules, Proposition 33."  Read article.


Posted by Kathy Meeh

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Kathy,

Once again cut and paste cut and paste

We all read this in the paper the other day

geesh

Kathy Meeh said...

"..We all read this in the paper the other day.."Anonymous 1:22 PM

Seriously, I doubt you understand what you read, otherwise you would comment on the article content and merit. Clue: 1) the huge cost of all campaigns, 2) wealthy entities taking over our democracy, 3) wealthy ANONYMOUS entities determining the outcome of elections, 4) The deception of organizations naming themselves the opposite of their intention, 5) the campaigns themselves, or the ballot propositions. Even local campaigns could be discussed.

Articles offer dialog comment opportunities you never seem to take. Rather you repeatedly snipe others (many of those comments are in spam). Worse, you are such a coward you do not use your own name. Neither do YOU post articles, so according to your own criteria YOU are incapable of even "cutting and pasting". None of this speaks well of what YOU are doing. Another clue: Consider being someone other than an anonymous aberrant drag on the conversation. YOU can.

Ed said...

We do not have a democracy anymore. We have corporate sponsored elections. I think this is one reason why we are seeing groups like occupy and soverign rise up. If we were somehow able to take the money out of elections then we can go back to being a democracy. When you have dems and reps controlling the commission on presidential debates then the playing is not level. When you have the supreme court stating that corporations have the same rights as individuals and that they can contribute any amount of money they want then you have serious problems. Corporations have no responsibilty except to their bottom line. Something smells and I do not think it is the sewer treatment plant this time.

Hutch said...

Public unons are destroying California with their outrageous pensions, retiring at 55 and other unsustainable benefits like saving up sick days and health coverage for life. This is bankrupting the state, counties and cities like Pacifica and taking money from programs for the poor.

I hope Prop 32 passes. At least it's a start and will take away some incentive for politicians caving to unions.