Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Think Sideways: The Rockaway Business Loop


by Ian Butler
 
Two of the most controversial issues in Pacifica are the highway widening and the Quarry, so let me further complicate matters with a flippant proposal that combines the two into one giant uber-controversy. And it just might be our best option.
 
The way I see it, the main problem with highway widening is that it’s just too damn wide. There is already not enough room for the businesses on either side, and it’s a long way for any pedestrian that (heaven forbid) needs to cross. Add two more lanes plus an optional center island and many of us would rather take our chances tight-rope walking Niagara Falls.
 
Next door in the Quarry the problem is that in the present economy nobody in their right mind would want to develop it any time soon, and we don’t have much time until the redevelopment zone turns back into a pumpkin. Meanwhile the businesses at Rockaway Beach hang on by a thread awaiting something, anything that will attract more visitors.
 
So what can we do now that would increase the viability of the Quarry while simultaneously easing traffic congestion and attracting more visitors? Allow me to introduce the “Rockaway Business Loop”, a term that I would have copyrighted if absolutely no effort were required to do so.
 
The loop would simply go through the Quarry from the light at Reina Del Mar to Old County Road and/or Dondee way in Rockaway. Let’s face it, there’s plenty of room for a two lane road in the quarry. Heck, Peebles was going to put in a road AND hundreds of homes, businesses, a ballpark, a town square and still have room for “open space”, so a road is pretty much the least we can put there. At the moment much of the area is mostly a breeding ground for gophers and pampas grass, so on an environmental level there’s really not much to miss.
 
The real question is whether this would actually alleviate traffic on Hwy 1, and the answer is: a little bit. All drivers heading to or from Rockaway could avoid the bottleneck, and during peak traffic some brave commuters would choose to take the business loop, effectively allowing the traffic on Hwy 1 to keep moving while the light is red.
 
More importantly, it would diversify the traffic flow. Right now there is only one way to drive from Reina Del Mar to Fassler, and if it’s blocked for any reason your only choice is which swear words to utter and at which volume. But if there were a frontage road, or “business loop” available, you would have a real choice, and that is important, especially if you happen to be an emergency vehicle.
 
It’s been said that adding more lanes to cure traffic congestion is like adding more belt to cure obesity - it just encourages more driving and the new capacity is quickly filled up. But adding alternatives is another matter. In San Francisco there is no correct way to get anywhere; every driver has his or her own way of getting around, and this works remarkably well. For example, when the Embarcadero freeway was torn down traffic actually improved because the drivers spread out across multiple alternatives.
 
As the name implies, a business loop would route commuters towards existing businesses, while enticing new businesses into the area, hopefully leading to the critical mass needed to become a thriving destination. And even if nothing is ever built in the Quarry, the Rockaway area is also in the redevelopment zone, so revitalizing that area would boost the city’s bottom line.
 
The real obstacle to this idea: reality. For one thing Caltrans is pretty much done choosing it’s plan and this ain’t it. They’ve already received 11 alternate plans from the public and have shown no interest in considering any of them, so there’s no reason to think they will consider the 12th. But they once famously said they “don’t do tunnels”, so they are capable of responding to public pressure and doing the right thing, once all other options have been exhausted.
 
Even if Caltrans could be convinced, the area is ground zero for more warring factions than the Middle East, so the odds of something like this actually coming to pass are only slightly better than the Pope converting to Judaism.
 
Nevertheless, this can be a useful mental exercise, an example of the possibilities that open up when we break free of the environment/development dichotomy that has paralyzed our city for years. If both sides are willing to give some ground then maybe we can find some common ground, and maybe even some common sense - an increasingly uncommon commodity.
 
Submitted by Ian Butler

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

I like it. And , I don't really like you. But, I like your idea.

Let the arguing begin.

Anonymous said...

Are we going to tell the property owner? Or just bulldoze our way through? Eh what the heck, I like it too. Mazels from His Holiness!

Anonymous said...

nah, no arguing required. Just recognize Pacifica can no longer study everything to death. Ian Butler has an idea, no money, no developer, no ownership to the property and no ability to navigate the regulatory maze required to get anything done on the coast. We have several thousand single occupant cars from Pedro Pt, Linda Mar, Vallemar and points south (
plus emergency vehicles) all waiting for a road solution now 20 years late.
All the suggested alternatives are offered by the Gang of No-- anything but a road. Can't wait for the Take the Bus gang to weigh in.

Anonymous said...

This idea is so dumb it would only appear on Fix Pacifica.... oh wait.

Hutch said...

Good idea Ian but don't quit your day job. Your friends would never allow the violation of sacred NIMBY burial ground.

As far as this statement "in the present economy nobody in their right mind would want to develop it"

Have you seen all the new building in SF, DC, SB etc?

Anonymous said...

Butler's Loop has as much of a chance of happening as the widening of the road. That's right.
My idea is we install really big and powerful catapults at Vallemar and Rockaway and just shoot those suckers over that stretch of highway. Some restrictions will apply.

Anonymous said...

Eon Butler is the problem. I hate to say it. He is a pretty nice guy but he doesn't get it.

Once again if your not a homeowner or taxpayer, you will never get it.

Anonymous said...

Hutch offered, "Have you seen all the new building in SF, DC, SB etc?"

LEGO'S don't count, Hutch, LEGO'S don't count.

Anonymous said...

dog carts.
levitation
skate boards

Anonymous said...

anon 527 said dog carts, levitation and skateboards... Yup, those should work, too. Who needs a wider road or The Butler Loop? We have alternatives. Catapults for those in a hurry to save 4 minutes, dog carts because, hey, the dog that bit Pete shouldn't have to walk anywhere ever again, levitation because you do know council isn't really sitting down, and skateboards-- damn those little effers, sorry Len.

Hutch said...

Anonymous 5:21 PM said...
Hutch offered, "Have you seen all the new building in SF, DC, SB etc?"
LEGO'S don't count, Hutch, LEGO'S don't count.

------------
NIMBY's lie #271, the economy is bad, nobody is building.

San Francisco immersed in construction boom
http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/07/san-francisco-immersed-construction-boom

"We're hitting record levels each month in our building permit activity - San Jose Building Department director.
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/business&id=8739951

Anonymous said...

Hutch why on earth do you persist in comparing our potential for growth with San Jose or SF? It's a meaningless comparison. We're not a destination for jobs, not an economic engine, not a population center, and all roads do not lead to Pacifica. If you want to be valid, then compare us with another similar town or several similar towns. That would be meaningful.

Anonymous said...

Right 1001, compare Pacifica to any San Mateo county city. Pacifica is #1 at the bottom. Ha, easy comparison, Hutch.

Anonymous said...

Hutch-lite @1013 Yes, you've made a comparison and I'll be darned if it isn't just as meaningless as the original one offered by the Classic-Hutch.

Anonymous said...

@1013 Pacifica is #1 at the bottom???????? WTF? You mean like, last? Or, worst?

Anonymous said...

1054, 1101, 1001, your same bottom level, meaningless advance conclusion voiding efforts to explore.

20 San Mateo county cities, Pacifica's per capita General Fund spending on residents is #20, lower than #19 East Palo Alto.

Hutch said...

@ 1001 & 1054

Whoa don't bust a blood vessel. Where here did I compare Pacifica with any other city. I merely said there's a building boom going on SF and other cities.

Work on that reading comprehension guys.

Anonymous said...

East Palo Alto was the murder capital of the United States.

Worse then Crenshaw, Newark NJ, worse then Detroit

Worse then Compton!

Now they have a 4 star hotel, Ikea, and a brand new shopping center. Why? Cause they wanted to improve.

Anonymous said...

Pacifica:

surfers
deadbeats
hippies
nobees
meth heads

Anonymous said...

Anon 831
You forgot conspiracy theorists and people who think any development Is good development.

Anonymous said...

anon830 EPA has been undergoing gentrification since mid-90's. Much of it funded through redevelopment. The good old days--the ones we missed out on.
Now redevelopment funding is gone and EPA is scrambling to find financing to develop the 4 Corners/Ravenswood Biz District. Property is owned by over a 100 different parties but EPA wants a downtown and geography is limited. Gee, seems like we have more in common with EPA than we think. And the murder rate is down to 5 or 6 per year from 25 or so 15-20 years ago.