Saturday, September 15, 2012

Cell phones and health - anything we should know?


"A federal appeals court has blocked the implementation of a San Francisco law requiring cellphone dealers to warn customers that cellphone use might expose them to cancer-causing radiation. 

The City and County of San Francisco’s cellphone ordinance was to take effect in October 2011, but enforcement has been delayed pending industry legal challenges. The ruling in CTIA-The Wireless Association v. City and County of San Francisco, Calif., on Monday by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco blocked enforcement of the ordinance while those challenges continue.

Wedding cake special:  "I can hear you now."
The cellphone ordinance would require cellphone dealers to give phone buyers a fact sheet informing them that the World Health Organization had classified radio frequency emissions from the phones as a possible carcinogen. It also would require retailers to display posters and place stickers on display ads presenting similar information."  Business Insurance/Rodd Zolkos, 9/12/12.  "San Francisco law warning of cellphone radiation blocked."   Read article.

....  " The ordinance, believed to be the first of its kind in the nation, requires cellphone dealers to tell customers the devices may expose them to cancer-causing radiation levels. 

....  The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday barred enforcement while the case continues. In its brief, unpublished opinion, the court reversed a trial court judge who said the city could compel cellphone companies to distribute a “fact sheet” because its Board of Supervisors concluded “there is debate in the scientific community about the health effects of cellphones.”

The cellphone industry’s lobbying group filed a lawsuit in 2010 seeking to invalidate the city’s ordinance. The industry claims that the city’s requirements go beyond disclosures that are “purely factual and uncontroversial” and stray into disputed views of cellphones. The disclosures would advise consumers on what to do if they want to reduce cellphone emissions."  The Daily Journal (San Mateo)/Associated Press, 9/12/12.  "Court blocks San Francisco cell phone warning law."    Read article. 

References - Where are the USA radiation studies?   Dr. Oz website, "How to avoid cell phone dangers."  Related - Cell Reception, Cell phone towers in Pacifica, CA. 

Related articles - Guardian, UK, 4/26/12. "No clear evidence that mobile phone radiation damages health." "Largest review yet of published research finds that so far there has been 'no indication' of increased risk." Very reassuring in England.  

Posted by Kathy Meeh

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

What does this have to do with Pacifica?

Nothing.

Anonymous said...

tin foil hat lately?

Kathy Meeh said...

Same 'ol "dumber than dirt" serial comment from you Anonymous, 10:01 AM: "its not about Pacifica." However, brain damage does not stop at Pacifica boarders, inside or outside. And personally I'm not sympathetic to your whining. Submit your own "Pacifica" articles.

Questions: How many people in Pacifica have cell phones? Yes most of us. And do you remember a few years back when people protested instillation of cell phone towers in their neighborhoods, near their houses? I do, reason: radiation concerns.

And are cell phones harmful to human brain and body cell health? The article seems to indicate there is a black-out on cell phone research, and the industry has lobbied against such studies. Surprise, surprise. Meantime, cell phones have been with us for more than 20 years (more commonly 10 years). Hence, most of the nation's population are brain and body cell radiation guinea pigs. That includes you Anonymous, and that includes most of us Pacificans.

Here's an advisement from Dr. Oz, "How to avoid cell phone dangers." So read it, you might save a brain or body cell. Meantime I'll add the link to the article.

Anonymous said...

"does not stop at Pacifica boarders"

Oh goodness, does that mean homeowners need to wear tinfoil hats too?

Anonymous said...

@1001 The signs are all there. You and Ms. Meeh are in a relationship. Don't deny your feelings. To paraphrase Brother Bray, man up.
Anonymity is no obstacle to raw animal attraction.

Anonymous said...

anon 745 golly everything else seems to stop at Pacifica's borders...all the good stuff anyway.

Anonymous said...

Worried about radiation? Getting troublesome transmissions?
I find lining my bicycle helmut with tin foil and a layer of Bounce
dryer sheets provides superior protection, easy to manage hair, and a very pleasant scent as I go about my day.
No, I am not a member of the city council.

Anonymous said...

It's not about the borders... According to Meeh, it's the boarders. Apparently, she desn't trust anyone who can't afford to own their own home.

Anonymous said...

That all you've got 928? Petty, but A+ spelling. Almost as smart as 812. Oh wait, you're the same joker.

Steve Sinai said...

If cell phones and cell phone towers caused cancer, evidence would have been showing up by now.

Anonymous said...

Maybe it's not cancer they cause, maybe it's kraykray. Plenty of that showing up all around us.

Anonymous said...

Sinai, is a medical expert also!