Just saw this article on Gypsy Hill on the Riptide blog. Several
weeks ago,m I had commented on fixpacifica.com about the feasibility of
rezoning Gypsy Hill as commercial. Unknown to me at the time, it appears
that a portion of Gypsy Hill already has that zoning and building homes
on that portion of the property would require a modification of the
General Plan. I still feel that an office park or other commercial
venture at that location is worth exploring if indeed, Pacifica is
serious about increasing revenue via a commercial base. Perhaps you can
share this article with your readers. Thanks, Dan Murray | |
Opinion: Gypsy Hill Project Requires Change in General Plan
Source: pacificariptide.com
Pacifica
Riptide is the original social media in Pacifica, California, featuring
news and opinion on the San Mateo County coastside since 2007.
| |
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Gypsy Hill Rezoning
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
What is Keener talking about "We had no early warning about Harmony @ One"?
This project was gone over and modified by queen Nancy Hall herself years ago. The Pacifica enviro leaders put in all their requests for green building and sustainable designs which were agreed on and incorporated into these designs. Now Greener wants to oppose It? Hmmm and they wonder why they're called the gang-of-no.
Oh, please, Hutch. Don't you go trying to understand or explain what John Keener is saying.
Post a Comment