Thursday, July 14, 2011

Boxer Urges Action On Helping Responsible Homeowners Act


Finally, some forward thinking. Is it too late?

Jim Wagner


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:July 12, 2011

Contact:  Zachary Coile <mailto:zachary_coile@boxer.senate.gov?subject=RE:%20Media%20Advisory> or Andy Stone <mailto:andy_stone@boxer.senate.gov?subject=RE:%20Media%20Advisory> (202) 224-8120
BOXER URGES ACTION ON HELPING RESPONSIBLE HOMEOWNERS ACT 

Bipartisan Bill Would Remove Barriers Preventing Homeowners Who Are Making Their Payments From Refinancing at Historically Low Interest Rates

Washington, D.C.
– Today, U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) held a press conference call to discuss her bill, the Helping Responsible Homeowners Act of 2011, which would remove barriers that have prevented millions of homeowners with non-delinquent, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac-backed mortgages from refinancing at historically low interest rates. She also urged the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to use its existing authority to eliminate these obstacles to refinancing.

Senator Boxer’s bill, S. 170 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.170.IS:> , would allow an estimated two million homeowners to refinance at a significantly lower interest rate, which would save families thousands of dollars and boost the economy.

“The time to help struggling homeowners is now – while interest rates remain at near-historic lows,” Senator Boxer said. “This legislation would help millions of responsible homeowners who are making their payments, but are still struggling to make ends meet. By helping these homeowners refinance at lower rates, we will put thousands of dollars back in the pockets of families and strengthen our economy.”
 
Senator Boxer was joined on the call by Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, and Ronald Phipps, president of the National Association of Realtors, who spoke in strong support of the bill. The legislation has also been endorsed by the National Consumer Law Center, the National Association of Mortgage Brokers, the California Association of Realtors, the California Association of Mortgage Professionals, William Gross, managing director and co-CIO of PIMCO, and housing economist Thomas Lawler.

Boxer also announced on the call that Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA), who ran one of the nation’s largest independent residential real estate brokerage companies, has joined as a co-sponsor of the measure.

The bill aims to help borrowers who continue to make their mortgage payments on time, but whose homes have lost value during the real estate crisis.  Currently, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac offer refinancing programs to these homeowners. However, participation has been low, in part because homeowners must pay high, risk-based fees up front to refinance their loans – even though Fannie and Freddie already bear the risk if these homeowners were to default on their loans.
These additional fees can be as high as two percent of the loan amount, or an extra $4,000 on a $200,000 loan.  These fees can discourage borrowers from refinancing at a lower rate, making it more likely that they will eventually default.
Senator Boxer’s legislation would:
·         Eliminate risk-based fees on loans for which Fannie and Freddie already bear the risk;

·         Remove refinancing limits on underwater properties;

·         Make it easier for borrowers with second mortgages to participate in refinancing programs;

·         Require that borrowers are able to receive a fair interest rate, comparable to that received by any other borrower in good standing who has not suffered a drop in home value and has stayed current with their mortgage payments.

Interest rates for 30-year home mortgages remain near historically low levels – under five percent. Yet of the 27.5 million mortgages guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, over 8 million still carry an interest rate at or above 6 percent.
For the average homeowner – with a $150,000 loan – lowering the interest rate by 1 percent would save $1,100 a year. With up to two million additional borrowers refinancing, this would pump up to $2.2 billion annually into the economy.

The legislation is also expected to lead to up to 54,000 fewer defaults by homeowners and produce a net savings of up to $100 million for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anything the brain dead boxer is offering , run from. Gov ment will own your home and tell you when and how to run it. Andrew Cuomo, back in the Clinton days, was the head of HUD. Cuomo forced socializing housing,he knew 30% of homes to the poor would foreclose. Looks like the democrats/communists are not giving up. Frank/Dodd bill-Must Read for anyone in the Real Estate Business. Know what you are dealing with.

Anonymous said...

Seems like a perfectly reasonable bill to me. I must be a democrat/communist.

Anonymous said...

Yes, you are. It takes a commie to think that this bill is A.O.K.

Kathy Meeh said...

How does that work, Anon (1239)? Please explain.

big gov't said...

The scariest words you will ever hear are:

Hello, I am from your government and I am here to help!!!!

Kathy Meeh said...

Oh, that's your point unless you're the one who receives a needed benefit. Got it!

Grim reaper said...

Let's see how this works. Fan/Fred own the majority of these loans anyway, the banks are skimming the profit off the top, and if the homeowner walks, we all take a hit. Banks never lose! If you free up billions in saved housing costs, maintain the homes in private ownership, you may, just may do some good for a change. Dodd/Frank is a travesity written by the very two socialists most responsible for the mtg meltdown to cover their tracks and take the red laser pointer off their guilty foreheads!

Kathy Meeh said...

"Reaper" (854), there was regulatory body absence and failure during the prior 10 years. Banks, mortgage lending oversight, rating agencies, SEC scrutiny (or lack there of), derivatives.

The 9/21/10 Making Home Affordable (MHA) Certification on the surface looks okay. The Wharton Finance and Investment description 9/7/10 appears to be an initial regulatory improvement. Gaps and interpretation are mentioned. Implementation and compliance looks like an "oh yuck", and could be confusing. If you're in the mortgage industry, you likely have a real-life, better understanding of the "new rules".

"Points" to you, however, for name-calling Dodd-Frank. That comment may indicated you find "we the people of the United States" a disturbing concept.

Anonymous said...

The fact remains; democrats tried to socialize housing , but instead brought America to the brink of financial armageddon. The American People are waking up to this fact and know the truth. It is no wonder that the President wants to control the internet by censoring. In their own words the democrats; wanted, demanded, protected, then denied - deregulation of the housing industry, forcing banks to loan to poor, backed by fannie and freddie, they caused the complete collapse of America's economy. The scariest part of all of this is that they are not done.

Steve Sinai said...

You know it's true because Rupert Murdoch's network said so.

Kathy Meeh said...

"Democrats...brought America to the brink of financial armageddon"

We did? Wow. But as stated prior (7/16, 2:19pm), I think not true. Some of us still remember the incompetency or intended government screw-up of the Bush 8 year Presidency. Remember war "intelligence", Brownie, and additional tax welfare for the rich. Then there was big business loop holes, and regulation avoidance. On a national level we are now enjoying the consequences of that economy.

Were the current batch of Republicans elected to obstruct any National progress? It sure looks that way, they can't even pass what should be an automatic budget ceiling increase. Meantime, the most wealthy and big business continue to enjoy their tax breaks and tax loop-hole welfare-- while the elderly and poor are offered Ryan medicare reform coupons.

Anonymous said...

"Democrats...brought America to the brink of financial armageddon." That statement is so obviously false that if it wasn't so misguided and ignorant, it would be laughable. Yeah, it wasn't Wall Street and the investment banks that stole my retirement funds, it was the democrats. Go to hell.

Pacifica Democrats said...

So, the Pacifica Democrats brought the city to the brink of financial armadeddon!

Tastes Great vs Less Filling said...

Arguing about Democrats and Republicans is like arguing about Tastes Great vs Less Filing.

It is crap either way

Anonymous said...

Why does this bill only apply to Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac? I'm also a citizen of this country, residing in California, with a negative amortization mortgage loan held by Wachovia/Wells Fargo. My credit is excellent always paid on time but have been turned down for modifications (3) times. Deck appears to be stacked until savings are used up. This bill is discriminatory and extremely disappointing. The banks and lack of government representation are continuing to force many of us to make choices we should not have to.

Anonymous said...

Are most Pacifica city council democrats? Are most of the Ca Legislature Democrats? Are most of the Congress and Senators from California Democrats? If you answered all questions yes, then yes, democrats brought the city to the brink of financial armadeggon. Remember, its government that creates the climate for business to succeed or fail. And, how do they do this? through regulations. Democrats like to regulate everything, unless regulations stand in their way to wealth redistribution.

Anonymous said...

Q. Was it regulation or lack of regulation that caused our economy to crash?
A. It was those damn Democrats who regulated us into financial disaster.

Now I'd like to offer you an excellent deal on the sale of a bridge.

Kathy Meeh said...

"Democrats like to regulate everything, unless regulations stand in their way to wealth redistribution."

1. Wealth distribution. The top 20% now own 85% of wealth, the bottom 80% own 15% of the wealth. This redistribution has occurred over the past 30 years (when President Reagan's administration slashed the top tax bracket). UCSC/Domhoff/Sociology Research Study. See "Wealth Distribution" and "Historical Context".

2. Regulations. Clean air, clean water, food without being poisoned, houses and equipment that are relatively safe, best practices in medicine, law-- stuff like that.

3. City council offices everywhere in the USA are Nonpartisan.

What planet do you come from?

Jim Alex said...

"Democrats like to regulate everything, unless regulations stand in their way to wealth redistribution."

The only difference between Democrats and Republicans are:

Republicans make money in the private sector first then go into politics to make more

Democrats go into politics to make money.

Democrats were also called "Tax & spenders" but both parties are doing a pretty good job doing that!

Steve Sinai said...

"Democrats like to regulate everything, unless regulations stand in their way to wealth redistribution."

Was Arnold a Democrat? Was Bush a Democrat?

Anyone who thinks one party is responsible for the mess we're in at the state and federal levels, is part of the problem - not a part of the solution.

The problems in Pacifica were made worse by incompetent, no-growth ideologues.

Anonymous said...

Read about the Frank-Dodd Bill. It has not fixed the problems, only because the democrats continue to socialize housing. A report , yesterday, showed how Pres Obama used Social Security Funds to build Low Income Housing. Beautiful Housing, all inclusive, for illegal immigrants.

http://www.uschamber.com/reports/unfinished-agenda

Jim Alex said...

Was the Pacifica City Council Republican?

What I was saying was

They have all become "tax and spenders"

Steve Sinai said...

Jim, Democrats are tax and spend. Republicans are borrow and spend.

Anonymous said...

"A report , yesterday, showed how Pres Obama used Social Security Funds to build Low Income Housing." That's not in the link. Where is this report?

Howard Jarvis said...

It's hard to imagine but congress is fighting about rolling back spending to, I believe, 2008 levels. How dysfunctional have we become when the vast amount of money wasted 3 years ago is not sufficient enough to waste now!

jim alex said...

Steve

What differnce does it make your maxed out either way.

Kathy Meeh said...

Jarvis Anonymous (228 get a different name), I don't follow your logic, but I suppose you would have preferred a world wide depression 3 years ago.

And, now for several weeks the citizens of this country are now plagued with the utter stupidity, threat and drama of not raising the nation's debt limit. This new group of Republicans in Congress are dumbest bunch of political bunnies ever.

Steve Sinai said...

Makes no difference, Jim. We're in bad shape with either party.

Anonymous said...

http://www.project.nsearch.com/video/welfare-recipients-living-bett

Here is the link/video that shows welfare housing for illegal aliens paid out of our social security funds. FIRE CONGRESS!

jim alex said...

Raising the debt limit is not the problem. The debt is the problem

It is like being maxed out and getting a couple new credit cards to max out

Kathy Meeh said...

Anon (827) What you missed in your research is that the housing project in Tacoma is factually affordable and low-cost, quality housing. See Tacoma Housing Authority.

Most cities have these projects. Locally Half Moon Bay seems to have done a good job, Pacifica needs to do much more.

The website you've reference is another far-right nonsense blog designed to incite fear, race and class bating. Note: there is no proof or authoritative references. The video "drive by" with all those $50,000 "expensive" cars is fiction, observable if you actually looked at the cars.

Housing programs are government sponsored for which people must qualify. Do you really think the government is housing a bunch of illegal Chinese, Koreans, and Mexicans? (I state these specific, targeted countries because again the video does).

I hope the FBI is investigating some of this "lunatic fringe" nonsense. BTW, Georgia crop losses" this year could be $1 billion, the result of their new anti-migrant farm labor legislation. Clarification: Migrant workers would be illegal aliens to you.

One outstanding need you bring-up is the congressional delayed paths to legal immigration and better work visas. And, I think you have a point with "fire the new congress" who were swept-in on "fixing government" and creating new jobs. Alternatively so far their priorities have not been supportive of the common people; they delivered policies of social and financial obstruction.

Anonymous said...

You do not know what you are talking about. Specific Housing is; designed, built-for, immigrants; legal and illegal;paid-for,from Social Security Funds.

You could spin it all you want by using the failed "far-right nonsense blog designed to incite fear, race and class bating" argument. It is not working.

Sorry to tell you, there is proof, lots of it. And yes, they have done this in San Francisco, for the chinese.

See, the problem is WE ARE BROKE! If you want to give all your money away to these people you go right ahead. I say enough. No More. Until we solve our debt problems.

Paul Gann said...

Jeez, Meeh, you're a little overbearing! And that's being polite. Give my buddy Howard a break. Dems/Repubs, they're all screwing this country up. Get a grib and stop drinking the cool-aid.

Kathy Meeh said...

Anon (535) I don't like fraudulent misrepresentation in names or lies presented as information. Dead Paul Gann and Howard Jarvis are not you, and you should not use their identification period, especially with the misguided trash you have been posting.

Anon (355) targeting immigrants ("illegal aliens" so stated by you at 827) and the poor was not represent by fact or proof. The video was fraudulent propaganda, promoted by a far-right website. And, there is a huge disconnect with this country being broke, and the targeting the poor.

Concerned about USA debt? How about looking at welfare for 1) the most wealthy including the effective tax rate and tax loop holes; and 2) welfare for big businesses that are housed off-shore, or those that don't pay taxes, or those who are beneficiaries of cash subsidies (such as the oil companies). "Go where the money is." (Willie Sutton).

You may have point in saying "the Dems/Repubs, they're all screwing this country up". Politics and big money are way too cozy if that's your point (which it may not be). Also, the link you posted in error from the US Chamber of Commerce wanting to modernize and clean-up regulations was good.

Raising the USA debt limit is suppose to be a given-- not a threat of intentional country financial destruction. The debt limit was raised 7x under President Bush (yesterday I said 5x in error). Here is that raising the debt limit history under President Bush.

Barney Frank said...

Wait till I cut the mortgage interest deduction.

Socrates said...

There are a lot of un-marked graves in this world referred to as anonymous. Does that mean anyone using the moniker "anonymous" must stop per Ms Meeh's instructions?
Oh, and I have seniority on these dead guys.