This is the only article I've seen on disincorporation, it's so rare that no one knows of the consequences. -Lionel Emde
BUDGET ISSUES COULD BRING DEATH OF CITY
Author(s): Julia Scott, julia.scott@bayareanewsgroup.com Date: August 28, 2010 Section: LocalBetween budget losses and payments to settle a lawsuit, Half Moon Bay's financial situation has become so dire that if a local sales tax measure doesn't pass in November, officials say they may have to disincorporate the 51-year-old town.
City leaders have raised that possibility for a few weeks now as they try to
persuade voters to pass Measure K, a one-cent sales tax increase that would help
the city balance its budget with an extra infusion of $1.4 million a year for
the next seven years.
Dissolving Half Moon Bay -- handing the city's budget, operations and
services to San Mateo County -- would be an absolute last resort, but the city
may not have many other options left, City Councilman John Muller said.
"The council has done everything in its power to keep the city whole,"
Muller said. "If it doesn't pass, we could seriously not be in business much
longer."
At first glance, disincorporation could save taxpayers some money: no
more city administration to support. Police services would be contracted out,
and the county would cover planning, building and public works projects from its
offices in Redwood City.
On the other hand, county officials said there is a chance that locals
would end up paying more than they do now for fewer services.
City Manager Michael Dolder concedes disincorporation is one of the
options on the table. The City Council already cut $900,000 from the current
budget -- including half the city's employees -- and imposed furloughs on those
who remain. Some of the cuts were needed to pay for the Beachwood lawsuit
settlement, a $15 million burden the city will shoulder in bond payments for the
next 20 years.
Despite those efforts, the city will finish the current fiscal year with
a deficit of more than $500,000. And tourist dollars, the city's economic
mainstay, aren't likely to increase anytime soon.
"We're digging ourselves into a hole, and the hole keeps getting deeper
regardless of whether the sales tax comes in," Dolder warned.
Too much to lose
Across the state, cities are struggling to provide the services residents
have come to expect with fewer revenues and staff. People are looking for a way
out, according to Bill Chiat, executive director of the California Association
of Local Agency Formation Commissions.
"There certainly have been cities in this economic climate that have
inquired about disincorporation," Chiat said. "But once people who talk about it
actually find out what happens in disincorporation, they generally don't want to
pursue that path."
Dolder ticks off the drawbacks of disincorporation: a county-controlled
police department, sporadic road maintenance, no City Council to which to
complain; and no recreation department to offer yoga classes or soccer
workshops.
"The majority of residents in San Mateo County choose to be in a city
because they get better service," Dolder said. "If the county provided better
service, more people would choose to be in the county."
Ironically, Half Moon Bay chose to incorporate in 1959 in large part
because residents wanted a local police force and local control of street
maintenance.
Muller was born in Half Moon Bay. For him, disincorporation would be more
than a question of losing face -- it would be a loss of identity.
"Do you have pride in the city? Do you want keep it as Half Moon Bay? Do
you want to have local control over your government?" he asked. "Over the hill,
nobody knows you."
Debt would remain
Disincorporation is so rare in California that it's almost without
precedent. The last city to do it, Cabazon in Riverside County, had fewer than
2,000 residents and no functional government to speak of when it voted to give
up cityhood.
The process is so complicated that county officials said they don't know
what kinds of services the Board of Supervisors would choose to provide or how
much they would cost.
Although the law lays out a clear procedure for disincorporation,
including public meetings and a final majority vote by residents, it's unclear
how it could work from a practical standpoint, said Martha Poyatos, executive
director of the San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission.
"We're in uncharted territory," she said.
The rural city of Isleton, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, toyed
with disincorporation in 2008 when faced with a budget deficit of $1.12 million
(the city only has a $1.35 million budget). In the end, officials decided to
sell bonds to pay off its debts. Now it is struggling to make bond payments.
"I've cut everything I can cut, and we're right up against the wall,"
Isleton City Manager Bruce Pope said. "We're not (facing disincorporation) now,
but we could go there at any time."
Submitted by Lionel Emde
9 comments:
I pray for Pacifica to go county. then they will strip all the hillside protection, blow out the quarry to max development, and make HWY 1 a 4 lane super highway. And the nobies can sit there and cry at what THEY made happen.
The hippies and noobees will all jump from manor overpass.
works for me 1052. make it quick before our liabilities grow.
"We're digging ourselves into a hole, and the hole keeps getting deeper regardless of whether the sales tax comes in." Gee, doesn't that sound like Pacifica? Put down the shovels, clowncil!
This is Pathetica. We do things our way because we know better. From the effects mentioned in the article it would seem we have already begun disincorporating. Services, programs and infrastructure are failing all over the city. This will continue to grow worse. Much worse. With our usual brilliance we're just doing our disincorporation without the county umbrella. This is Pathetica!
In order to disincorporate there needs to be a vote. What is the payoff in signing a petition or voting for discincorporation? Who will stand up for disincorporation and start to collect signatures and run a campaign? For or against quarry development, or for or against highway widening, I don't see those hot potatos fueling a disincorporation drive, let alone get one passed. My crystal ball on future is that
yes, we may go bankrupt, suffer through diminshed services and ultimately emerge from bankruptcy. However, housing values are rising, the assessor may reverse the blanket decline in values from 2009 to "market", fuel prices are rising, (gas sales are one of city's big money makers on taxes)...maybe there is some hope on retail sales taxes and TOT rising during the coming few months and perhaps we will continue to tread water indefinitely.
Ahhh, it's a glorious future for Pacifica. Scrape along the bottom for years, fail to develop so much as a head cold, probably file bankruptcy after some "who knew water was wet" crisis, and emerge from bankruptcy just in time to be smashed flat by the next global economic burp.
Hell, I bet the county could sneak around and mismanage just as well as our locals. Cut out the middle-man. Bring on the county.
The hippies and nobees will be out in full force this Monday yapping in city councils ears.
Post a Comment