New technology to detect tsunami's faster, 20 minute warning. Sounds like the city needs to get busy and apply for a new federal or state grant, Steve. Or the city could wait, and potentially a few thousand Linda Martians and visitors could be wiped-out.
Meantime, if 3-4 minutes is the current tsunami warning, the sign you posted or advisement from Mr. Anderson (Pacifican interviewed) may have the key: hear the sound, immediately head for the hills. That is if you're not lost while shopping at Linda Mar, uh oh.
My geology professor said the San Mateo Coast isn't as threatened by tsunamis as areas to the north and south because the San Andreas fault moves from side to side, rather than up and down. It's the latter that cause the big tidal waves like we've had in Japan and Southeast Asia.
I remember seeing a picture of a medium size fishing boat that was deposited on Hwy 1 at Princeton following a tsunami in (?)1946. So how remote the chances might appear, it could happen.
Want to share an article or opinion? Unlike some other Pacifica blogs, Fix Pacifica won't bury viewpoints we disagree with. Send your submission, along with your name, tofixpacifica@gmail.com.
People may comment anonymously, but any comments that degenerate into 1) personal attacks against individual blog participants; 2) incomprehensible gibberish; or 3) attempts to turn conversations into grade-school playground brawls, will be removed.
5 comments:
New technology to detect tsunami's faster, 20 minute warning. Sounds like the city needs to get busy and apply for a new federal or state grant, Steve. Or the city could wait, and potentially a few thousand Linda Martians and visitors could be wiped-out.
Meantime, if 3-4 minutes is the current tsunami warning, the sign you posted or advisement from Mr. Anderson (Pacifican interviewed) may have the key: hear the sound, immediately head for the hills. That is if you're not lost while shopping at Linda Mar, uh oh.
Gonna be an environmental bio hazard if a tsunami hits that sewer overflow pond.
My geology professor said the San Mateo Coast isn't as threatened by tsunamis as areas to the north and south because the San Andreas fault moves from side to side, rather than up and down. It's the latter that cause the big tidal waves like we've had in Japan and Southeast Asia.
Take it for what it's worth.
Pacifica had damage in the 1950's from a tsuami.
South facing beaches and harbors tend to get more damage.
I remember seeing a picture of a medium size fishing boat that was deposited on Hwy 1 at Princeton following a tsunami in (?)1946. So how remote the chances might appear, it could happen.
Post a Comment