Tuesday, December 11, 2012
CA lost track of Pete's Harbor lease, rent due 28 years later
Omission found in the State tenant asking for property transfer for development. Now a new source of State revenue. Wonder how many more of these missing (deferred fee) leases exist in California? Very amusing.
Palo Alto Daily News/Bonnie Eslinger, 12/11/12. "Pete's Harbor owes state agency 28 years of rent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Ok, the connection to Pacifica is that if we had a harbor the city would probably manage it in just the same way. We'd have more commissions and task forces involved but zero revenue for decades. Decades.
It's the Pacifica City Council's fault
No, anon958. Thankfully, the Pacifica City Council can only screw-up Pacifica and screw-over Pacificans. Outside of their bubble-of-stupid they are powerless. This is the way it's always been, my child. And, anyhow, RWC has it's own eff-ups.
This is The states screw up, not Pacifica's for once!
Post a Comment