Sunday, January 29, 2012

Current view of City council meetings and issues in Santa Cruz


Santa Cruz is building a seawater desalination plant, banning bull frogs, providing shelter for the homeless. Council meetings occur during the daytime. 

Santa Cruz has 7 council members. Note:  all present.
Santa Cruz Sentinel/J.M. Brown 1/24/12. "The City Council on Tuesday approved a fifth contract with a San Francisco-based consultant amid ongoing objections from opponents of a seawater desalination plant. Water Department Director Bill Kocher said the $95,000 contract for Kennedy/Jenks would cover work on the project's Environmental Impact Report expected in April, including responding to public comments and questions about the analysis.

The cost will be shared with the city's desalination partner, Soquel Creek Water District.  Not including Tuesday's agreement, the city has approved contracts with the firm totaling $1.48 million since the 2009 fiscal year, Kocher said. The firm has billed the city and Soquel Creek Water District for $1.35 million so far, Kocher said, denying criticism the consultant had caused cost overruns.
"Once again you're being asked for a blank check," said Ron Pomerantz, a 2010 council candidate who opposes the plan.

Santa Cruz City Hall
Tuesday, the council also approved a Water Department's request to ban the sale and possession of live American bullfrogs in an acknowledgement that the invasive species threatens the California red-legged frog and spreads disease. A staff report said several pet stores, "the primary center of live bullfrog commerce in Santa Cruz," reported that the ban would not substantially hurt business.

Also Tuesday, the council, under direction from a state law passed in 2007, approved the Public Facilities zoning as one where emergency shelters can be established as a permitted use not requiring a public hearing. The zone includes government-owned lands only, including schools. The ordinance, required of all cities and counties, also identifies the Harvey West industrial area and a former cannery site in Seabright as zones where such shelters, offering a bed for six months or less, can be established though a conditional use permit. The city would be required to find those plans are compatible and not a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhood before granting the permit, a process that would allow for a public hearing."No matter where emergency shelters go, people will be concerned about them," Councilwoman Lynn Robinson said. The council began Tuesday's meeting by watching a video of Mike Tomasi, a former homeless veteran and longtime character at council meetings, giving one of his classic speeches criticizing city leaders. His speeches also often offered praise and ended with "all the love I can throw at you." Tomasi, who died Jan. 16, sat on the front row of most daytime council meetings, and the city placed a large bouquet of flowers at his seat. In a tribute to how Tomasi often greeted them, council members stood in unison to salute the flowers, offering Tomasi a final "Love ya."

Posted by Kathy Meeh

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

I thought this blog was Fix Pacifica, not Fix Santa Cruz.

Kathy Meeh said...

"...Santa Cruz."

You need not be so provincial, Anon (1215). Fix Pacifica? Everyone knows how. But over 10 years, Pacifica city council has refused to "fix Pacifica".

Interesting Santa Cruz has different concerns and focus on money. Santa Cruz city council is moving forward with a seawater desalination plant, against some citizen objections. They are also and dealing with homeless shelter locations.

Pacifica insists on being a coastal city, rather than a "gateway to the coast" city. Santa Cruz with about the same size population as Pacifica is one model.

Anonymous said...

We need a boardwalk area like Santa Cruz has, rides, businesses, food. Perfect location.
Oops, Pacifica, CA destroyed by massive NIMBY convulsion.

Anonymous said...

Oh goodie, a desalination plant. Pacifica is ready for another hare-brained, super expensive hobby. Remember bio-diesel? Hey, let's cut the enormous energy cost of the plant by going nuclear. How hard could it be? I mean, our state-of-the-fart sewer plant almost works.

Anonymous said...

Santa Cruz has always been a hippie place. University town with politics and street people just like Berkeley. Declared themselves a nuclear-free zone years ago. Boardwalk is still making money.

Hutch said...

"We need a boardwalk area like Santa Cruz has, rides, businesses, food. Perfect location.
Oops, Pacifica, CA destroyed by massive NIMBY convulsion."

Wouldn't that be great? Rockaway is the perfect spot too. Oh oops there the endangered red spotted san flea. Scratch that.

Anonymous said...

So true. Instead of facing our economic reality and making the cuts that need to be made, cuts and consolidations that other cities are making, those that run this city want us to keep pouring our hard-earned dollars down the deeper and deeper rathole that is Pacifica. Why? To preserve and protect their comfort at our expense. No other reason.
Scratch this ridiculous town.

Anonymous said...

What did Julie L. say?? Maybe it costs more to live in a City like ours. Really...Did the NIMBYS ever consider the Senior Faction that cannot afford any more taxes (fixed income)? Wait till we lose our Police,the Sheriff Dept raises their rates and the Mexican Mob moves in, just like HMBay. Canada sounds like a great haven at this point. EH?

Anonymous said...

Yes, you should leave immediately because the Mexicans are on their way to your house now.

Kermit said...

Don't let Nancy Hall get wind of the desalination plant idea. Yep, straight to the Vreelander to get it all set up. So what if it doesn't work, is extremely expensive, and we can't afford it! Vree knows what's good for us. Hell, we only wasted how much on the bio poop project?

Oh, and I have the perfect use for the quarry. A Bull Frog resettlement camp? We'd end up with the same thing we get from the council 3, bullshit!

Anonymous said...

Let's send Nancy Hall, John Maybury and Pete Loeb on and around the world trip that lasts about 5 years. When they get back Pacifica will be transformed into a productive self supporting destinations that balances natural recourses and commerce.

Anonymous said...

Anon@1118 You sound so full of hope and trust. Heartbreaking. Your 5 year plan is self-delusion. Useful in making you feel better about the dismal future of Pacifica and CA in general, but completely devoid of realism. But what the heck, exile anyone you want. Won't make much difference at this stage.

Anonymous said...

What Anon 244? It was a free trip? Don't worry when they get back we'll have a gun store across from Nancy's house, a freeway through Pete Loeb's yard, and a replacement writer that doesn't twist the truth for John Maybury.

Anonymous said...

and Lionel gets to be CEO of Recology, ok?

Anonymous said...

promise?

Anonymous said...

Yah, as a matter of fact I would before my property value would drop and you can pay all the imposed future parcel taxes. Hmmm, you may jus be a renter and that wouldn't apply now, would it??

Anonymous said...

Oh sure, that would explain it.