Saturday, October 30, 2010

Nancy Hall's Letter to the Editor

Editor:
 
As we Pacifican's enter election season, the usual ruckus ensues with the usual suspects firing comments from their prospective camps, a simple minded Punch and Judy show with business development proponents duking it out with those devoted to environmental protection. Any thinking person understands that we need to invest in both things intelligently and cooperatively, but that would require a leap of evolution we seem slow to make.
 
Example: In last week's paper, Frank Vella's venom against local enviros mentioned the biodiesel project's demise as proof that we greens don't have the answers. Mr Vella doesn't mention that he and his cohorts devoted themselves intensely to the project's failure, spreading crazy talk about giants gas clouds melting the faces off local school children etc, etc. This was at least in part payback for my having devoted myself to not having an entire city built in the Quarry. Back and forth we go.
 
The leap is this: stop waiting for Superman. Stop expecting elected officials to be either super-humans on our behalf or punching bags on which we vent all of our own failure and frustration. We have a culture where we wait for the latest batch of mommies and daddies to solve all the problems while everyone else sits back creating them, and when they fall or don't live up to impossible expectations, we crucify them. Public servants are facilitators of OUR collective dreams for the future, and not solely responsible for them.
 
I recently had a coffee meeting with one  city council candidate. A new face. A business person. We chatted a while, and I listened to concerns and complaints about our finances, "the city," the current council, the lack of a sturdy enough tax base, empty store fronts, the labyrinth that is local licensing and permitting, etc. Then I had to say. "You know, some like to blame our financial woes on environmentalism, but we did the part we, as greens, were wired to do, we've succeeded in making sure that one of this town's primary assets our small green piece of the irreplaceable California Coast-was not paved into oblivion. People's perception of Pacifica has widely improved due to our growing reputation as an unspoiled  authentic community and a great place for many types of outdoor recreation. These folks spend money while they are here, some even end up buying homes. Our improved image and identity is salable,. You guys are the business side of the brain. Let's work some of this stuff out"
 
My question to this candidate was "What have you done in a  positive way to alleviate the things that are frustrating you? Where is your own track record for problem solving?" The answer was that so far the business community has "not been organized" Well, fill some store fronts, find ways to promote locally owned business that keep money right here in town, partner with the greens instead of trying to obliterate us. In other words, stop complaining about what we have done and what you haven't done. Show us your leadership skills if you want to be a leader. We'll follow you if you're going somewhere, but not if you are just complaining about what the "other" side has not done to satisfy you.
 
I am voting for the local candidates I think will not only continue to protect our vital green assets, but work with the business community to help identify unnecessary impediments to developing a more vital, locally owned economy that fills in rather then paves over open land. Those candidates are Jim Vreeland, Leo Leon, and Sue Digre. But regardless of who our council people are, we owe them not only our thanks for their willingness to serve, but our creativity and cooperative spirit lent to collective problem solving.
 
Nancy Hall
Vallemar
 
Submitted by Jim Alex

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Mrs. Hall. Don't be a copy cat . Using the example of the recently movie " Waiting for Superman". You just don't want to admit that's the reason why the education is going to dumps.
All those politician that listen to their friends for what is convenient to them. And forget about the rest all the people.

That is why you are supporting the incumbents and Leon because they will listen to you.

I can't understand what you're saying said...

Anonymous, please learn to write a coherent English sentence before posting again.

Kathy Meeh said...

Nancy Hall cheered at then Mayor Vreeland's "state of the city" address (about 3 years ago) when he mentioned Pacifica is a "poor city". Voting for Nancy Hall's candidates and following her "economic plan" will assure speedy city decline.

Shall we really debate the merit and value of NOT developing 45 acres of the 88 acre quarry (designated for development in the city general plan)? Lost: an estimated $17 million annual tax revenue, services, jobs, a city downtown.

Did Nancy Hall even support Sharp Park "open space" golf course? Or,was her plan to tear it down. I think the latter, or should I say "Plater".

Kathy Meeh said...

Here's is the Waiting for Superman reference for those who may not know the assumed reference used by Nancy Hall.

With regard to 8 year city council, however, it hasn't been lack of knowledge or opportunity that blocked balanced city development and an economy for this city-- rather, it has been a radical ideology promoted by propaganda to convince the public.

City council and "friends" (including Pacificans for (NO) Sustainable Development, including Nancy Hall) collaborated in this 8 year "poor city" effort. From my view this is an ethical failure, not an educational failure. Those involved are all smart enough, but ethically challenged.

Anonymous said...

It was a blessing in disguise the bio-diesel plant and the Peebles project did not get built. Chalk it up to bad timing for both. But, now that we have had time to educate ourselves a little more on both, it is the bio-diesel plant that would of caused more damage. Too close to homes and schools. Peebles project was too big for the majority of the democrats in town , after all, many who vote with the democrats eventually want all of us off the coast and into areas where we can be stacked and taken care of by government. Don't believe me? Pay attention to those articles that get never get read because they are hidden.

The Piper said...

"Any thinking person understands that we need to invest in both things intelligently and cooperatively, but that would require a leap of evolution we seem slow to make."
Ok, Ms Nancy, now that you understand that we need to invest in both things intelligently, and, Pacifica has over 50% open space, what is your point? You've won. Go dance with the forest fairies. When the time comes to pay the piper, call Pan.

Anonymous said...

translation: "ive been getting my way and i dont give a damn if you get yours"

Anonymous said...

'Public servants are facilitators of OUR collective dreams for the future, and not solely responsible for them."
No, they have not been that at all. The bio-diesel plant is a perfect example of a public process, taken private behind closed doors,run amok. The garbage contract with Recology is another example of the same thing.

"The answer was that so far the business community has "not been organized" Well, fill some store fronts, find ways to promote locally owned business that keep money right here in town, partner with the greens instead of trying to obliterate us."
Why is it that the city council and the staff that they allegedly direct have not done anything toward this end? Is there any leadership coming from the city council, which is one of the highest-paid in San Mateo County? Do they have any responsibility toward this goal or are the people left to drift?

I find this letter incomplete in its viewpoint.

Scotty said...

Nancy talks out of both sides of her mouth so frequently that I’m surprised she hasn’t given herself whiplash. First she complains about the “simple minded Punch and Judy show”, but then she immediately jumps into one of those characters (I’m not sure whether the greenies are Punch or Judy). Next, she tries to pretend that people’s fear tactics killed the grease refinery, ignoring Whole Energy’s financial insolvency and ignorance (or willful violation) of the permitting process. She also conveniently ignores her part in the selection of that vendor.

Her last comments are the most illuminating. First she complains about people who “wait for the latest batch of mommies and daddies to solve all the problems”. Then, she basically says that her job is to fight for the frogs and snakes because that’s what she’s “wired to do” and that business people need to swoop down and clean up her multiple messes afterwards. Who’s the one waiting for Superman in this scenario?!?

Her comments summarize the naïve and dangerous NIMBY mindset that has driven this city into such a financial ditch, which is why any responsible person would vote for anyone but Vreeland, Digre, and Leon.

Anonymous said...

Nancy Hall - every letter she writes is about how she's some kind of "martyr" for the environmental movement.