The Supervisors Budget Committee
will hold their final public meeting on the 2010-2012 budget on
Wednesday, June 30, starting at 5:00 p.m. at the Supervisors'
Legislative Chambers, San Francisco City Hall, Second Floor.
The proceedings will be televised
live on SF Government TV, Channel 26, on the web at: http://www.sfgovtv.org/index.aspx?page=69
At that meeting, the Budget
Committee will vote on recommendations that it will make to the Full Board of Supervisors
for changes to the Mayor's Proposed Budget. (See link to
the Mayor's Proposed Budget:
After the Budget
Committee makes its recommendation, the Full Board of Supervisors will
meet twice in the second half of July to vote on establishing the
2010-2012 budget. The full procedure is described at pages
33-36 of the Mayor's Proposed Budget, linked
above.
Although the Budget Committee
heard twice from the Rec & Park Department, at public hearings June
17 and 24, there were no questions from the Supervisors, and no comment
by Rec & Park Department representatives, about Sharp Park or its
finances. At the Budget Committee's June 21 public comment session,
Public Golf Alliance members and other Sharp Park Golf Course supporters made a
spirited defense of the golf course; on the other hand, golf opponents
called for the golf course to be closed because it "loses money".
Golf Alliance member Mike Wallach has prepared an excellent
summary of Sharp Park finances and of the pro-and-con Sharp Park public
testimony at the June 21 Budget Committee meeting:
.
Additionally, Mike has prepared
two excellent u-tube videos:
(1) explaining the Sharp Park
finances (i.e., that Sharp Park is a net revenue-producer for the city,
rather than the so-called "money loser" as mistakenly claimed by golf's
opponents): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HddmobFkgw
and
(2) showing an exchange at Supervisor
Mirkarimi's December 16, 2009 public hearing between Rec & Park
Director Phil Ginsberg and Supervisor Mirkarimi, in which Mr. Ginsberg
explained how revenue from Sharp Park subsidizes other Rec & Park
programs and functions, and Supervisor Mirkarimi characterized the
claims of "operating loss" at Sharp Park as "de minimus" and "small
The Rec & Park Budget appears
at pages 369-375 of the Mayor's Proposed Budget (linked above). It
is not detailed, and Sharp Park is not separately described or mentioned.
There is nothing in the Capital Projects section of the Proposed
Budget for sea wall or habitat restoration at Sharp Park.
So the golf opponents' argument
that Sharp should be closed in order to save millions of dollars in sea
wall and related capital
expenditures is just baloney. There are no such
capital costs in the 2010-2012 budget now under consideration by the
Supervisors. If Sharp Park Golf Course were to be closed
now, the effect on the 2010-2012 budgets would be (1) reduction in
income to the city; (2) no capital cost savings; and (3) closure of a
much-beloved, widely-used, and historic People's Golf Course.
We will continue to keep you
posted on developments. Thanks for your work to Save
Sharp Park.
-- Richard Harris
San Francisco Public Golf
Alliance
392-5431, ext.
203
1 comment:
While I certainly appreciate the links in Richard's missive, just thought I should point out that there is a somewhat improved version of that post with the same linked videos right here at Fix Pacifica.
Post a Comment