The second highlighted paragraph holds a clue to a potential future refreshing tax for Pacifica.
Palo Alto Daily News/Bonnie Eslinger, 10/26/12. "Supervisor says San Mateo County isn't considering a soda tax-- at least, not yet."
 |
| Will this tax pass? I don't think so |
 |
| New City revenue, how refreshing ! |
"Although
San Mateo County eventually may consider taxing soda and other
sugar-sweetened drinks to fight obesity, no such proposal is in the
works right now, Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson said Thursday.
Jacobs
Gibson made the comments following a 2½-hour meeting in which health
officials batted around ideas for encouraging residents to reduce
consumption of sugary beverages.
The meeting included a
presentation by Richmond City Council Member Jeff Ritterman, a retired
cardiologist who was instrumental in placing a penny-per-ounce soda tax
measure on his city's Nov. 6 ballot.
Jacobs Gibson told The Daily News
after the meeting. The board of supervisors this week approved a ban of
carryout bags at stores in unincorporated areas and is counting on 24
Peninsula and South Bay cities to follow suit."
Read article.
Posted by Kathy Meeh
Richmond, is in the East Bay, the last time I checked?
ReplyDeleteWhat does this have to do with Pacifica?
Kathy, are you turning into Julie Lancelle?
ReplyDeleteMaybe Richmond can send us some of this soda money?